Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

8.9k papers and 269.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 8.9k papers published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage in the last decades have received a total of 269.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage usually cover Rheumatology (6.3k papers), Surgery (3.3k papers) and Pharmacology (1.7k papers) specifically the topics of Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms (6.0k papers), Knee injuries and reconstruction techniques (1.6k papers) and Total Knee Arthroplasty Outcomes (1.6k papers). The most active scholars publishing in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage are Ernst B. Hunziker, Francis Bérenbaum, David J. Hunter, Wim B. van den Berg, Stefan Lohmander, Tuhina Neogi, Virginia B. Kraus, P.M. van der Kraan, Richard F. Loeser and Roy D. Altman.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage.

Countries where authors publish in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Osteoarthritis and Cartilage with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Osteoarthritis and Cartilage more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025