I. Swinkels
- Pharmacology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Surgery
- Co-authors
- D.H. de BakkerLando L. J. KoppesMaurits W. van TulderWillem van MechelenJohannes R. AnemaL.C. LambeekR.D. FrieleJoost Dekker
- Topics
- Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers)Clinical practice guidelines implementation (8 papers)Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited KingdomIsrael
In The Last Decade
I. Swinkels
35 papers receiving 784 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
- Pharmacology 375
- General Health Professions 243
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 166
- Economics and Econometrics 125
- Surgery 123
Countries citing papers authored by I. Swinkels
This map shows the geographic impact of I. Swinkels's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by I. Swinkels with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites I. Swinkels more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by I. Swinkels
This network shows the impact of papers produced by I. Swinkels. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by I. Swinkels. The network helps show where I. Swinkels may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of I. Swinkels
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of I. Swinkels. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of I. Swinkels based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with I. Swinkels. I. Swinkels is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 55 | |
| 5 | EHealth at different speeds: a brief outline eHealth-monitor 2018. | 1 |
| 6 | Het gebruik van eHealth in de zorg voor mensen met een verstandelijke beperking. | 0 |
| 7 | 45 | |
| 8 | 87 | |
| 9 | 14 | |
| 10 | 37 | |
| 11 | 16 | |
| 12 | 9 | |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 3 | |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 194 | |
| 17 | Directe toegang fysiotherapie : de keus is aan de patiënt | 1 |
| 18 | 81 | |
| 19 | 14 | |
| 20 | 77 |
About I. Swinkels
I. Swinkels is a scholar working on Medical Terminology, Health Information Management and Pharmacy, having authored 42 papers that have together received 815 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation (9 papers), Clinical practice guidelines implementation (8 papers) and Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Medical Terminology (6 citations), Pharmacology (375 citations) and Medical Laboratory Technology (19 citations). I. Swinkels has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United Kingdom and Israel. Frequent co-authors include D.H. de Bakker, Lando L. J. Koppes, Maurits W. van Tulder, Willem van Mechelen, Johannes R. Anema, L.C. Lambeek, R.D. Friele, Joost Dekker, M. Huygens and Luc de Witte. Their work appears in journals such as Spine, BMC Public Health and Journal of Medical Internet Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.