Janis R. Bedarf
- Molecular Biology
- Neurology top 2%
- Physiology top 10%
- Speech and Hearing top 2%
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Falk HildebrandArjan NarbadStefano RomanoGeorge M. SavvaIan G. CharlesUllrich WüllnerPeer BorkFelix Goeser
- Topics
- Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers)Gut microbiota and health (5 papers)Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers)
- Journals
- PLoS ONENeurologyScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Janis R. Bedarf
18 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
- Molecular Biology 690
- Neurology 473
- Physiology 287
- Speech and Hearing 200
- Biological Psychiatry 178
Countries citing papers authored by Janis R. Bedarf
This map shows the geographic impact of Janis R. Bedarf's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janis R. Bedarf with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janis R. Bedarf more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janis R. Bedarf
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janis R. Bedarf. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janis R. Bedarf. The network helps show where Janis R. Bedarf may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janis R. Bedarf
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janis R. Bedarf. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janis R. Bedarf based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janis R. Bedarf. Janis R. Bedarf is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 108 | |
| 5 | Meta-analysis of the Parkinson’s disease gut microbiome suggests alterations linked to intestinal inflammationbreakdown → | 462 |
| 6 | 3 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 14 | |
| 11 | Functional implications of microbial and viral gut metagenome changes in early stage L-DOPA-naïve Parkinson’s disease patientsbreakdown → | 461 |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 10 | |
| 17 | 3 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 1 |
About Janis R. Bedarf
Janis R. Bedarf is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Nephrology and Emergency Medicine, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation (5 papers), Gut microbiota and health (5 papers) and Respiratory Support and Mechanisms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (178 citations), Neurology (473 citations) and Speech and Hearing (200 citations). Janis R. Bedarf has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Falk Hildebrand, Arjan Narbad, Stefano Romano, George M. Savva, Ian G. Charles, Ullrich Wüllner, Peer Bork, Felix Goeser, Luís Pedro Coelho and Shinichi Sunagawa. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Neurology and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.