Janine Diehl‐Schmid
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 0.5%
- Physiology top 1%
- Neurology top 1%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Neurology top 1%
- Co-authors
- Alexander KurzRobert PerneczkyChiadi U. OnyikeHans FörstlAlexander DrzezgaTimo GrimmerMarkus OttoAdrian Danek
- Topics
- Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (81 papers)Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (54 papers)Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (17 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONENeuroImage
- Partner nations
- GermanySwitzerlandAustralia
In The Last Decade
Janine Diehl‐Schmid
132 papers receiving 4.1k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 131
- Psychiatry and Mental health 2.0k
- Physiology 1.7k
- Neurology 1.1k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 947
- Neurology 633
Countries citing papers authored by Janine Diehl‐Schmid
This map shows the geographic impact of Janine Diehl‐Schmid's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janine Diehl‐Schmid with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janine Diehl‐Schmid more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janine Diehl‐Schmid
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janine Diehl‐Schmid. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janine Diehl‐Schmid. The network helps show where Janine Diehl‐Schmid may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janine Diehl‐Schmid
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janine Diehl‐Schmid. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janine Diehl‐Schmid based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janine Diehl‐Schmid. Janine Diehl‐Schmid is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 64 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 33 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 11 | |
| 12 | Dementia care in the Danube Region. A multi-national expert survey | 0 |
| 13 | 16 | |
| 14 | 69 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 58 | |
| 17 | 44 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 29 | |
| 20 | 41 |
About Janine Diehl‐Schmid
Janine Diehl‐Schmid is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Neurology and Physiology, having authored 143 papers that have together received 4.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (81 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (54 papers) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Research (17 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (2.0k citations), Neurology (633 citations) and Neurology (1.1k citations). Janine Diehl‐Schmid has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Switzerland and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Kurz, Robert Perneczky, Chiadi U. Onyike, Hans Förstl, Alexander Drzezga, Timo Grimmer, Markus Otto, Adrian Danek, Lina Riedl and Albert C. Ludolph. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and NeuroImage.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.