Janice Redmond
Impact in
- Genetics top 2%
- Mesenchymal stem cell research
- Developmental Neuroscience top 5%
Papers in
-
- Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research 6
-
- Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion 12
- Co-authors
- William A. BaumgartnerJay G. ShakeJennifer MeyersBradley J. MartinMark F. PittengerPeter J. GruberKenton J. ZehrDuke E. Cameron
- Journals
- The Annals of Thoracic Surgery (20 papers)Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery (3 papers)Journal of Surgical Research (2 papers)Neurology (2 papers)Epilepsia (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIrelandUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Janice Redmond
84 papers receiving 2.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 114
- Genetics 574
- Developmental Neuroscience 164
- Surgery 1.4k
- Biomaterials 305
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 367
Countries citing papers authored by Janice Redmond
This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Redmond's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Redmond with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Redmond more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Redmond
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Redmond. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Redmond. The network helps show where Janice Redmond may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Janice Redmond, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 27 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 7 | 2014 | 9 | |
| 8 | 2008 | 64 | |
| 9 | 2002 | 15 | |
| 10 | 2002 | 3 | |
| 11 | Mesenchymal stem cell implantation in a swine myocardial infarct model: engraftment and functional effects Hit paper breakdown → | 2002 | 698 |
| 12 | 1998 | 2 | |
| 13 | 1998 | 70 | |
| 14 | 1997 | 47 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 43 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 71 | |
| 17 | 1993 | 40 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 35 | |
| 19 | 1988 | 19 | |
| 20 | 1983 | 4 |
About Janice Redmond
Janice Redmond is a scholar working on Developmental Neuroscience, Pathology and Forensic Medicine, Emergency Medicine, Neurology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 88 papers that have together received 2.6k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Ischemia and Reperfusion (12 papers), Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (10 papers), Cardiac and Coronary Surgery Techniques (8 papers), Mechanical Circulatory Support Devices (7 papers), Congenital Heart Disease Studies (7 papers), Anesthesia and Neurotoxicity Research (6 papers), Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (6 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Genetics (574 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (164 citations), Surgery (1.4k citations), Biomaterials (305 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (367 citations). Janice Redmond has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Ireland and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include William A. Baumgartner, Jay G. Shake, Jennifer Meyers, Bradley J. Martin, Mark F. Pittenger, Peter J. Gruber, Kenton J. Zehr, Duke E. Cameron, Benjamin G. Domb and Jonathan McGuinness. Their work appears in journals such as The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, Journal of Surgical Research, Neurology and Epilepsia.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.