Janice Gill

552 total citations
20 papers, 442 citations indexed

About

Janice Gill is a scholar working on Physiology, Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and Statistics and Probability. According to data from OpenAlex, Janice Gill has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 442 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Physiology, 7 papers in Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty and 6 papers in Statistics and Probability. Recurrent topics in Janice Gill's work include Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (12 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers). Janice Gill is often cited by papers focused on Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control (12 papers), Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (7 papers) and Statistical Methods in Clinical Trials (6 papers). Janice Gill collaborates with scholars based in Australia, New Zealand and United States. Janice Gill's co-authors include Mark Shephard, Ken Sikaris, Graham Jones, Peter E. Hickman, Samuel D Vasikaran, Ee Mun Lim, John Beilby, Gus Koerbin, Jillian R. Tate and Tina Yen and has published in prestigious journals such as Clinical Chemistry, Clinica Chimica Acta and Clinical Biochemistry.

In The Last Decade

Janice Gill

20 papers receiving 417 citations

Peers

Janice Gill

PHYSI

SPU

EDM

PHEOH

GHP

Sandra Secchiero Italy

Gunn B.B. Kristensen Denmark

Una Ørvim Sølvik Norway

Carmen Biosca Spain

Rodney W Forsman United States

Stephen Church United Kingdom

Virtudes Álvarez Spain

Zorica Šumarac Serbia

Alex Katayev United States

Henk M. J. Goldschmidt Netherlands

Sandra Secchiero Italy

Janice Gill

206 ×0.9

PHYSI

138 ×0.9

SPU

30 ×0.4

EDM

47 ×0.8

PHEOH

27 ×0.5

GHP

Citations per year, relative to Janice Gill Janice Gill (= 1×) peers Sandra Secchiero

Countries citing papers authored by Janice Gill

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janice Gill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janice Gill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janice Gill more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janice Gill

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janice Gill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janice Gill. The network helps show where Janice Gill may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janice Gill

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janice Gill. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janice Gill based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janice Gill. Janice Gill is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Greaves, Ronda F., Chung Shun Ho, Brett McWhinney, et al.. (2016). Achievements and Future Directions of the APFCB Mass Spectrometry Harmonisation Project on Serum Testosterone.. PubMed. 37(2). 63–84. 17 indexed citations

2.

Greaves, Ronda F., Gerald Woollard, T A Walmsley, et al.. (2014). Laboratory medicine best practice guideline: vitamins a, e and the carotenoids in blood.. PubMed. 35(2). 81–113. 33 indexed citations

3.

Koerbin, Gus, Jillian R. Tate, Julie Ryan, et al.. (2014). Bias Assessment of General Chemistry Analytes using Commutable Samples.. PubMed. 35(4). 203–11. 20 indexed citations

4.

Tate, Jillian R., Ken Sikaris, Graham Jones, et al.. (2014). Harmonising adult and paediatric reference intervals in australia and new zealand: an evidence-based approach for establishing a first panel of chemistry analytes.. PubMed. 35(4). 213–35. 66 indexed citations

5.

Johnson, Lambro A., Gerald Woollard, T A Walmsley, et al.. (2013). Vitamin B1 and B6 method harmonization: Comparison of performance between laboratories enrolled in the RCPA Quality Assurance Program. Clinical Biochemistry. 46(9). 772–776. 19 indexed citations

6.

Jones, Graham, Ken Sikaris, & Janice Gill. (2012). 'Allowable Limits of Performance' for External Quality Assurance Programs - an Approach to Application of the Stockholm Criteria by the RCPA Quality Assurance Programs.. PubMed. 33(4). 133–9. 42 indexed citations

7.

Gill, Janice. (2011). Allowable limits of performance – statistical basis and implementation. Pathology. 43. S17–S17. 1 indexed citations

8.

Gill, Janice & Mark Shephard. (2010). The Conduct of Quality Control and Quality Assurance Testing for PoCT Outside the Laboratory.. PubMed. 31(3). 85–8. 7 indexed citations

9.

Shephard, Mark & Janice Gill. (2010). The National QAAMS Program - A Practical Example of PoCT Working in the Community.. PubMed. 31(3). 105–9. 13 indexed citations

10.

Gialamas, Angela, Caroline Laurence, Lisa N Yelland, et al.. (2009). Assessing agreement between point of care and laboratory results for lipid testing from a clinical perspective. Clinical Biochemistry. 43(4-5). 515–518. 16 indexed citations

11.

Laurence, Caroline, Angela Gialamas, Lisa N Yelland, et al.. (2008). A pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial to evaluate the safety, clinical effectiveness, cost effectiveness and satisfaction with point of care testing in a general practice setting – rationale, design and baseline characteristics. Trials. 9(1). 50–50. 39 indexed citations

12.

Dhatt, Gurdeep S., et al.. (2007). Implementing the Stockholm Conference hierarchy of objective quality criteria in a routine laboratory. Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (CCLM). 45(4). 549–52. 12 indexed citations

13.

Shephard, Mark & Janice Gill. (2006). The analytical quality of point-of-care testing in the 'QAAMS' model for diabetes management in Australian aboriginal medical services.. PubMed. 27(4). 185–90. 27 indexed citations

14.

Lim, Ee Mun, Ken Sikaris, Janice Gill, et al.. (2004). Quality Assessment of Interpretative Commenting in Clinical Chemistry. Clinical Chemistry. 50(3). 632–637. 61 indexed citations

15.

Lim, Ee Mun, Samuel D Vasikaran, Janice Gill, et al.. (2003). A discussion of cases in the 2001 RCPA-AQAP Chemical Pathology Case Report Comments Program. Pathology. 35(2). 145–150. 4 indexed citations

16.

Shephard, Mark & Janice Gill. (2003). Results of an innovative education, training and quality assurance program for point-of-care HbA1c testing using the Bayer DCA 2000 in Australian Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Services.. PubMed. 24(4). 123–30. 18 indexed citations

17.

Lim, Ee Mun, Samuel D Vasikaran, Janice Gill, et al.. (2003). A discussion of cases in the 2001 RCPA-AQAP Chemical Pathology Case Report Comments Program. Pathology. 35(2). 145–150. 10 indexed citations

18.

Tate, Jillian R., et al.. (2002). The harmonization of cardiac troponin I measurement is independent of sample time collection but is dependent on the source of calibrator. Clinica Chimica Acta. 324(1-2). 13–23. 12 indexed citations

19.

Vasikaran, Samuel D, et al.. (2002). Review of a pilot quality-assessment program for interpretative comments. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine. 39(3). 250–260. 23 indexed citations

20.

Wisenberg, Gerald, et al.. (1996). Standards for adult nuclear cardiology training. Canadian Cardiovascular Committee.. PubMed. 12(5). 481–4. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact