Janet McCabe

621 citations
21 papers · 139 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Janet McCabe

19 papers receiving 107 citations

Peers

Janet McCabe
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
  • Gender Studies 68
  • Communication 30
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 3
  • Visual Arts and Performing Arts 10
  • Music 6
Replace Kim Akass with:
Kim Akass United States
Kristen J. Warner United States
Lynne Joyrich United States
Hannah Hamad United Kingdom
Benjamin A. Brabon United Kingdom
Amy Villarejo Canada
Harry M. Benshoff
Ralina L. Joseph United States
Devoney Looser United States
Lucy Fischer United States
Janet McCabe relative to Kim Akass United States Kim Akass's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Kim Akass · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet McCabe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet McCabe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet McCabe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet McCabe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet McCabe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet McCabe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet McCabe. The network helps show where Janet McCabe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Janet McCabe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Janet McCabe Line = papers co-authored together Janet McCabe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 21 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Reading Sex and the city
200437
2
Feminist Film Studies: Writing the Woman into Cinema
200513
3
Reading 'The L Word': Outing Contemporary Television
200613
4 202212
5
Reading Six feet under : TV to die for.
200511
6 200611
7
Reading desperate housewives: beyond the white picket fence
20067
8 20187
9 20076
10 20124
11 20114
12 20033
13 20152
14 20112
15
What Has HBO Ever Done For Women
20082
16 20131
17 20191
18
The Baby Swim Book
19861
19 20161
20 20121

About Janet McCabe

Janet McCabe is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Communication, Social Psychology and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 21 papers that have together received 139 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Feminism, and Media (9 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (8 papers), Media, Gender, and Advertising (3 papers), Media Studies and Communication (3 papers), Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (1 paper), Asian Culture and Media Studies (1 paper), Surgical Simulation and Training (1 paper) and Feminism, Gender, and Sexuality Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (68 citations), Communication (30 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (3 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (10 citations) and Music (6 citations). Janet McCabe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Kim Akass, Deborah Jermyn, Michael Allen and Adam Dubrowski. Their work appears in journals such as Celebrity Studies, Feminist Review, Continuum, Critical Studies in Television The International Journal of Television Studies and Feminist Media Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact