Janet E. Stockdale

18 papers receiving 241 citations

Peers

Janet E. Stockdale
Comparison fields: 5 of 77
  • Sociology and Political Science 156
  • Political Science and International Relations 91
  • Social Psychology 61
  • Clinical Psychology 31
  • General Health Professions 23
Replace Wolfgang Jagodzinski with:
Wolfgang Jagodzinski Germany
Peter Ph. Mohler Germany
Anne-Marie Aish Sweden
Piet Hermkens Netherlands
Frank J. Weed United States
Richard T. Morris United States
Atsushi Naoi Japan
Daniel P. King United States
Charles R. Chandler United States
Craig B. Little United States
Janet E. Stockdale relative to Wolfgang Jagodzinski Germany Wolfgang Jagodzinski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.4×
Wolfgang Jagodzinski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Janet E. Stockdale

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Janet E. Stockdale's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet E. Stockdale with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet E. Stockdale more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Janet E. Stockdale

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet E. Stockdale. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet E. Stockdale. The network helps show where Janet E. Stockdale may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet E. Stockdale

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet E. Stockdale. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet E. Stockdale based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet E. Stockdale. Janet E. Stockdale is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Earned citizenship: assumptions and implications
10
2 12
3 23
4
AN EVALUATION OF THE IMPACT OF CRIMESTOPPERS
1
5 19
6 10
7 7
8
Violence at work. Physical attack and threatening behaviour--new survey findings.
7
9 12
10 1
11 1
12
Methodological techniques in leisure research.
6
13
People's conceptions of leisure; Response to Janet Stockdale's paper. In: Leisure: politics, planning and people. Conference proceedings, Sussex University, July 4-8, 1984.
1
14
What is leisure? An empirical analysis of the concept of leisure and the role of leisure in people's lives.
6
15 127
16 2
17 4
18 41
19 3

About Janet E. Stockdale

Janet E. Stockdale is a scholar working on Computational Mathematics, Urban Studies and Social Psychology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 293 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (4 papers), Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management (4 papers) and Cultural Industries and Urban Development (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (91 citations), Sociology and Political Science (156 citations) and Computational Mathematics (2 citations). Janet E. Stockdale has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Hilde T. Himmelweit, John Schopler, Gemma Harper, Andrew Wells, Kate Moore, Julia M. Pearce, Marita P. McCabe, Eleni Andreouli, Clare Hadley and Julie Dockrell. Their work appears in journals such as Management Decision, British Journal of Political Science and Personnel Review.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026