Janet Bujra
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- General Health Professions
- Economics and Econometrics
- Co-authors
- Nadine BeckmannRay BushUnni WikanCarolyn BayliesPatricia CaplanPaul LittlewoodMarjorie MbilinyiLisa Ann Richey
- Topics
- African history and culture studies (6 papers)African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (4 papers)HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomTanzaniaZimbabwe
In The Last Decade
Janet Bujra
33 papers receiving 331 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Sociology and Political Science 244
- Anthropology 92
- Political Science and International Relations 70
- General Health Professions 69
- Economics and Econometrics 54
Countries citing papers authored by Janet Bujra
This map shows the geographic impact of Janet Bujra's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Janet Bujra with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Janet Bujra more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Janet Bujra
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Janet Bujra. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Janet Bujra. The network helps show where Janet Bujra may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Janet Bujra
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Janet Bujra. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Janet Bujra based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Janet Bujra. Janet Bujra is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 37 | |
| 4 | 11 | |
| 5 | 9 | |
| 6 | Challenging Gender Inequalities in Africa | 2 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 9 | |
| 11 | 18 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | Political action and social identity : class, locality and ideology | 4 |
| 14 | Class, Gender and Capitalist Transformation in Africa | 1 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | 0 | |
| 17 | 32 | |
| 18 | 43 | |
| 19 | Proletarianization and the 'Informal Economy': A Case Study From Nairobi | 6 |
| 20 | 23 |
About Janet Bujra
Janet Bujra is a scholar working on Anthropology, Gender Studies and Development, having authored 35 papers that have together received 477 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include African history and culture studies (6 papers), African Sexualities and LGBTQ+ Issues (4 papers) and HIV/AIDS Impact and Responses (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (92 citations), Development (26 citations) and Safety Research (53 citations). Janet Bujra has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Tanzania and Zimbabwe. Frequent co-authors include Nadine Beckmann, Ray Bush, Unni Wikan, Carolyn Baylies, Patricia Caplan, Paul Littlewood, Marjorie Mbilinyi, Lisa Ann Richey, Teresa Rees and Howard Newby. Their work appears in journals such as American Anthropologist, The Sociological Review and Development and Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.