Jane Wright

627 citations
30 papers · 380 indexed · h-index 10

Jane Wright

26 papers receiving 310 citations

Peers

Jane Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Microbiology 39
  • Cultural Studies 50
  • Pharmacy 25
  • Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty 33
  • Research and Theory 4
Replace Charles Wu with:
Charles Wu United States
Rosemary A. Jadack United States
Carol A. Gosselink United States
Francine Lima Gelbcke Brazil
Kathryn M. Taylor Australia
Geoff Debelle United Kingdom
Grace Omoni Kenya
Patrick Okonta Nigeria
Julio Jiménez Puerto Rico
Denice Stewart United States
Jane Wright relative to Charles Wu United States Charles Wu's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10×
Charles Wu · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Wright. The network helps show where Jane Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 23 scholars most cited alongside Jane Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Wright Line = papers co-authored together Jane Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20233
2 20188
3 20162
4
Community and Public Health Nursing
201321
5 20112
6 20110
7 20111
8 20111
9 20101
10
Interpreting Section 2 of the Human Rights Act 1998 ? towards an indigeneous jurisprudence of human rights
20091
11
'The important symbols of nursing have not been eradicated--they have changed'.
20081
12
Promoting the Health of School Age Children
20084
13 20054
14 199819
15 19981
16 199621
17 1996107
18 199552
19 19941
20 197653

About Jane Wright

Jane Wright is a scholar working on Anatomy, Law, Pharmacy, Political Science and International Relations and General Health Professions, having authored 30 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Influenza Virus Research Studies (2 papers), Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting Issues (2 papers), Legal principles and applications (2 papers), Medical and Biological Sciences (2 papers), Government, Law, and Information Management (2 papers), Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes (2 papers), Minority Rights and Languages (2 papers) and Criminal Law and Evidence (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Microbiology (39 citations), Cultural Studies (50 citations), Pharmacy (25 citations), Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty (33 citations) and Research and Theory (4 citations). Jane Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Austria and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include J D Oriel, P. Reeve, Michelle Honey, Jessica Cohen, William M. Webb, David Sines, Norman Gootman, Sheldon Leader, Catherine Roberts and Lisa Bradford. Their work appears in journals such as Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, Journal of Clinical Nursing, Journal of Advanced Nursing, Human Rights Quarterly and Contemporary Nurse.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026