Jane R. Shaw

1.3k total citations
28 papers, 949 citations indexed

About

Jane R. Shaw is a scholar working on Speech and Hearing, Genetics and Psychiatry and Mental health. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane R. Shaw has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 949 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 24 papers in Speech and Hearing, 17 papers in Genetics and 16 papers in Psychiatry and Mental health. Recurrent topics in Jane R. Shaw's work include Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (24 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (17 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (16 papers). Jane R. Shaw is often cited by papers focused on Veterinary Practice and Education Studies (24 papers), Human-Animal Interaction Studies (17 papers) and Empathy and Medical Education (16 papers). Jane R. Shaw collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Australia. Jane R. Shaw's co-authors include Cindy L. Adams, Brenda N. Bonnett, Debra Roter, Susan Larson, Jason B. Coe, Gwyn Barley, Ashley E. Hill, Carl S. Ribble, Lori R. Kogan and Regina Schoenfeld‐Tacher and has published in prestigious journals such as Patient Education and Counseling, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association and Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice.

In The Last Decade

Jane R. Shaw

26 papers receiving 801 citations

Peers

Jane R. Shaw
McArthur Hafen United States
John O. Volk United States
Tierney Kinnison United Kingdom
Susan M. Matthew United States
Liz Mossop United Kingdom
Allison M. J. Reisbig United States
TJ HEATH Australia
McArthur Hafen United States
Jane R. Shaw
Citations per year, relative to Jane R. Shaw Jane R. Shaw (= 1×) peers McArthur Hafen

Countries citing papers authored by Jane R. Shaw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane R. Shaw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane R. Shaw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane R. Shaw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane R. Shaw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane R. Shaw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane R. Shaw. The network helps show where Jane R. Shaw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane R. Shaw

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane R. Shaw. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane R. Shaw based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane R. Shaw. Jane R. Shaw is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Shaw, Jane R., et al.. (2023). On-site communication skills education increases client-centered communication in four companion animal practices. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 261(9). 1–11. 1 indexed citations
3.
Shaw, Jane R., et al.. (2022). Evaluating third- and fourth-year veterinary students’ communication skills knowledge and performance at Colorado State University. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 260(13). 1–13. 3 indexed citations
4.
Shaw, Jane R.. (2019). Evaluation of communication skills training programs at North American veterinary medical training institutions. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 255(6). 722–733. 19 indexed citations
5.
Schoenfeld‐Tacher, Regina, et al.. (2017). Changes in Affective and Cognitive Empathy among Veterinary Practitioners. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education. 44(1). 63–71. 13 indexed citations
6.
Shaw, Jane R., et al.. (2016). Outcomes assessment of on-site communication skills education in a companion animal practice. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 249(4). 419–432. 28 indexed citations
7.
Shaw, Jane R., Cindy L. Adams, Brenda N. Bonnett, Susan Larson, & Debra Roter. (2012). Veterinarian satisfaction with companion animal visits. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 240(7). 832–841. 79 indexed citations
8.
Shaw, Jane R., Brenda N. Bonnett, Debra Roter, Cindy L. Adams, & Susan Larson. (2012). Gender differences in veterinarian-client-patient communication in companion animal practice. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 241(1). 81–88. 39 indexed citations
9.
Coe, Jason B., et al.. (2012). Effect of veterinarian-client-patient interactions on client adherence to dentistry and surgery recommendations in companion-animal practice. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 240(4). 427–436. 8 indexed citations
10.
Coe, Jason B., et al.. (2012). Effect of veterinarian-client-patient interactions on client adherence to dentistry and surgery recommendations in companion-animal practice. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 240(4). 427–436. 112 indexed citations
11.
Shaw, Jane R., Gwyn Barley, Ashley E. Hill, Susan Larson, & Debra Roter. (2010). Communication skills education onsite in a veterinary practice. Patient Education and Counseling. 80(3). 337–344. 38 indexed citations
12.
Adams, Cindy L., et al.. (2010). Use of the measure of patient-centered communication to analyze euthanasia discussions in companion animal practice. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 237(11). 1275–1287. 30 indexed citations
13.
Shaw, Jane R., Cindy L. Adams, Brenda N. Bonnett, Susan Larson, & Debra Roter. (2008). Veterinarian-client-patient communication during wellness appointments versus appointments related to a health problem in companion animal practice. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 233(10). 1576–1586. 83 indexed citations
14.
Bishop, Gail A., et al.. (2008). The Colorado State University Pet Hospice Program: End-of-Life Care for Pets and Their Families. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education. 35(4). 525–531. 13 indexed citations
15.
Shaw, Jane R., et al.. (2007). End-of-Life Communication in Veterinary Medicine: Delivering Bad News and Euthanasia Decision Making. Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice. 37(1). 95–108. 74 indexed citations
16.
Shaw, Jane R., Brenda N. Bonnett, Cindy L. Adams, & Debra Roter. (2006). Veterinarian-client-patient communication patterns used during clinical appointments in companion animal practice. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 228(5). 714–721. 73 indexed citations
17.
Shaw, Jane R.. (2006). Four Core Communication Skills of Highly Effective Practitioners. Veterinary Clinics of North America Small Animal Practice. 36(2). 385–396. 61 indexed citations
18.
Shaw, Jane R., Cindy L. Adams, & Brenda N. Bonnett. (2004). What can veterinarians learn from studies of physician-patient communication about veterinarian-client-patient communication?. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 224(5). 676–684. 105 indexed citations
19.
Shaw, Jane R., Cindy L. Adams, Brenda N. Bonnett, Susan Larson, & Debra Roter. (2004). Use of the Roter interaction analysis system to analyze veterinarian-client-patient communication in companion animal practice. Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association. 225(2). 222–229. 80 indexed citations
20.
Shaw, Jane R.. (1991). A successful transplant.. PubMed. 87(6). 265–7. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026