Jane Parry

67 papers receiving 889 citations

Peers

Jane Parry
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
  • Demography 211
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 25
  • Modeling and Simulation 54
  • General Health Professions 208
  • Public Administration 27
Replace Harold W. Willaby with:
Harold W. Willaby Australia
Christopher Steven Marcum United States
JONATHAN GARDNER United Kingdom
Isabelle Albert Luxembourg
Timothy R. Broady Australia
Nathaniel M. Lewis United Kingdom
Sarah Wilson United Kingdom
Svenn‐Erik Mamelund Norway
Juan León United States
Kim Yi Dionne United States
Jane Parry relative to Harold W. Willaby Australia Harold W. Willaby's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×6.8×
Harold W. Willaby · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Parry

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Parry's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Parry with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Parry more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Parry

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Parry. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Parry. The network helps show where Jane Parry may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Parry, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Parry Line = papers co-authored together Jane Parry links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 72 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2004135
2 202073
3 200971
4 200953
5 202046
6 201343
7
A new sociology of work
200537
8 200335
9 200734
10
Working after state pension age: qualitative research
200433
11 200533
12 200528
13 200827
14
Farmers, farm workers and work related stress
200526
15 200925
16 199124
17
Forging a New Future: the experiences and expectations of people leaving paid work after 50
200223
18
Working from home under Covid-19 lockdown: transitions and tensions
202120
19 201419
20
Independent living in later life
200418

About Jane Parry

Jane Parry is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Epidemiology, General Health Professions, Demography and Health, having authored 72 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Influenza Virus Research Studies (11 papers), Retirement, Disability, and Employment (7 papers), Employment and Welfare Studies (7 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (5 papers), Social Policy and Reform Studies (4 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (4 papers), Antenna Design and Analysis (3 papers) and Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Demography (211 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (25 citations), Modeling and Simulation (54 citations), General Health Professions (208 citations) and Public Administration (27 citations). Jane Parry has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, India and South Korea. Frequent co-authors include Helen Barnes, Rebecca Taylor, Duncan P. Hand, Zhang‐Cheng Hao, Jia‐Sheng Hong, Miriam Glucksmann, Lynne Pettinger, Maurice Bloch, J.R.A. Lakey and William N. MacPherson. Their work appears in journals such as BMJ, Ageing and Society, The Sociological Review, Anthropological Quarterly and Sociology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact