Jane M. Zhu
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Primary Care and Health Outcomes 27
- Healthcare cost, quality, practices 10
- Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare 7
- Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes 7
- Global Health Care Issues 6
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- Healthcare Policy and Management 45
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Emergency and Acute Care Studies 5
- Health top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
-
- Healthcare Systems and Reforms 4
- Co-authors
- Daniel PolskyK. John McConnellZirui SongYashaswini SinghJoseph Dov BruchRachel M. WernerYuehan ZhangChristina J. Charlesworth
- Journals
- New England Journal of Medicine (4 papers)JAMA (2 papers)Annals of Internal Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesChinaNew Zealand
In The Last Decade
Jane M. Zhu
59 papers receiving 850 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
- General Health Professions 506
- Economics and Econometrics 482
- Emergency Medicine 82
- Health 52
- Gender Studies 51
Countries citing papers authored by Jane M. Zhu
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane M. Zhu's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane M. Zhu with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane M. Zhu more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane M. Zhu
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane M. Zhu. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane M. Zhu. The network helps show where Jane M. Zhu may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane M. Zhu, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2025 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 5 | |
| 5 | 2024 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2024 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2024 | 8 | |
| 8 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2023 | 14 | |
| 10 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2022 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2021 | 4 | |
| 13 | 2021 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2020 | 5 | |
| 15 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2019 | 23 | |
| 17 | State-Based Marketplaces Outperform Federally-Facilitated Marketplaces. | 2018 | 2 |
| 18 | 2017 | 15 | |
| 19 | 2014 | 1 | |
| 20 | 2010 | 56 |
About Jane M. Zhu
Jane M. Zhu is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Economics and Econometrics and Health, having authored 66 papers that have together received 875 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Healthcare Policy and Management (45 papers), Primary Care and Health Outcomes (27 papers), Healthcare cost, quality, practices (10 papers), Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare (7 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (7 papers), Global Health Care Issues (6 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (5 papers) and Healthcare Systems and Reforms (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Health Professions (506 citations), Economics and Econometrics (482 citations) and Emergency Medicine (82 citations). Jane M. Zhu has collaborated with scholars based in United States, China and New Zealand. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Polsky, K. John McConnell, Zirui Song, Yashaswini Singh, Joseph Dov Bruch, Rachel M. Werner, Yuehan Zhang, Christina J. Charlesworth, Viren Patel and Judy A. Shea. Their work appears in journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, JAMA and Annals of Internal Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.