Jane M. Stockton

17 papers receiving 598 citations

Peers

Jane M. Stockton
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
  • Molecular Biology 600
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 416
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 56
  • Physiology 35
  • Computational Theory and Mathematics 34
Replace J Ptasienski with:
J Ptasienski United States
Stuart D.C. Ward United States
T P Kenakin United States
G.B. Schiavi Italy
David L. Saussy United States
Timothy A. True United States
Isabelle Van Liefde Belgium
Marina Mostardini Italy
Dagmar Stropova United States
E. Montagna Italy
Jane M. Stockton relative to J Ptasienski United States J Ptasienski's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
J Ptasienski · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane M. Stockton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane M. Stockton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane M. Stockton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane M. Stockton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane M. Stockton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane M. Stockton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane M. Stockton. The network helps show where Jane M. Stockton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane M. Stockton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane M. Stockton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane M. Stockton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane M. Stockton. Jane M. Stockton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1
Muscarinic acetylcholine receptors: structure, function subtypes and therapeutic perspectives.
4
2 11
3
Soluble and membrane-bound muscarinic acetylcholine receptors.
14
4 13
5 12
6 41
7 275
8 8
9 60
10 20
11
Muscarinic receptor subclasses: evidence from binding studies.
19
12 62
13 56
14
The theory, methods and relevance of muscarinic receptor binding studies.
1
15 4
16
Pirenzepine--a ligand with original binding properties to muscarinic receptors.
42
17 0
18 21

About Jane M. Stockton

Jane M. Stockton is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 663 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (14 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (7 papers) and Ion channel regulation and function (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (416 citations), Molecular Biology (600 citations) and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (56 citations). Jane M. Stockton has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Tanzania and United States. Frequent co-authors include N.J.M. Birdsall, Edward C. Hulme, A. S. V. Burgen, Christopher P. Berrie, Mary Keen, Michael J. Zigmond, Rudolf Hammer, Henry A. Lester, N. H. Wassermann and Joël Nargeot. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurochemistry, British Journal of Pharmacology and Molecular Pharmacology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026