This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Lally's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Lally with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Lally more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Lally. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Lally. The network helps show where Jane Lally may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Lally
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Lally.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Lally based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Lally. Jane Lally is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Lally, Jane, et al.. (2011). Integrating Resources and Strategies into an Emerging System of Professional Development: The Case of PITC in California.. Zero to three. 32(1). 11–17.1 indexed citations
2.
Lally, Jane, et al.. (2009). Once upon a Time, when the Journal Zero to Three Was Born.. Zero to three. 30(2). 4–8.2 indexed citations
3.
Lally, Jane. (2009). The Science and Psychology of Infant-Toddler Care: How an Understanding of Early Learning Has Transformed Child Care.. Zero to three. 30(2). 47–53.8 indexed citations
4.
Lally, Jane, et al.. (2006). Good Health, Strong Families, and Positive Early Learning Experiences: Promoting Better Public Policies for America's Infants and Toddlers.. Zero to three. 26(6). 6–9.1 indexed citations
5.
Lally, Jane. (2005). The Human Rights of Infants and Toddlers: A Comparison of Child-Care Philosophies in Europe, Australia, New Zealand, and the United States.. Zero to three. 25(3). 43–46.2 indexed citations
6.
Lally, Jane. (2003). Infant-Toddler Child Care in the United States: Where Has It Been? Where Is It Now? Where Is It Going?.. Zero to three. 24(1). 29–34.1 indexed citations
7.
Lally, Jane, et al.. (2003). Caring for Infants and Toddlers in Groups: Developmentally Appropriate Practice.24 indexed citations
8.
Lally, Jane, et al.. (2001). National Survey Reveals Gaps in the Public's and Parents' Knowledge about Early Childhood Development.. Young children. 56(2). 49–53.1 indexed citations
9.
Lally, Jane, et al.. (2000). Battered Agency Syndrome: The Challenge to Agencies Serving Low-Income Communities..2 indexed citations
10.
Lally, Jane. (1995). The Impact of Child Care Policies and Practices on Infant/Toddler Identity Formation.. Young children. 51(1). 58–67.21 indexed citations
Lally, Jane, et al.. (1981). Exploring Employment Opportunities for the Elderly in Child Care Services: A Feasibility Study. Report No. 3..
14.
Lally, Jane. (1973). The Family Development Research Program: A Program for Prenatal, Infant and Early Childhood Enrichment. Progress Report.. Syracuse University Press eBooks.8 indexed citations
15.
Lally, Jane. (1973). Training Paraprofessionals for Work with Infants and Toddlers.. Young children.3 indexed citations
16.
Honig, Alice Sterling & Jane Lally. (1973). Assessing the Behaviors of Caregivers. ABC-I and ABC-II..2 indexed citations
17.
Honig, Alice Sterling & Jane Lally. (1973). Assessing Teacher Behaviors with Infants in Day Care..5 indexed citations
Lally, Jane. (1970). Development of a day care center for young children.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.