Jane Kate Leonard
Impact in
- Cultural Studies top 5%
- Japanese History and Culture
-
- Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis
Papers in
-
- Chinese history and philosophy 9
- Vietnamese History and Culture Studies 4
- Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics 1
- Asian Studies and History 1
-
- Japanese History and Culture 6
- Co-authors
- Philip A. Kuhn (1 shared paper)R. Keith Schoppa (1 shared paper)John R. Watt (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The American Historical Review (3 papers)Modern Asian Studies (2 papers)Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient (1 paper)The Journal of Asian Studies (1 paper)China review international (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Jane Kate Leonard
13 papers receiving 72 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
- Cultural Studies 34
- History and Philosophy of Science 12
- Anthropology 21
- Sociology and Political Science 85
- Political Science and International Relations 34
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Kate Leonard
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Kate Leonard's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Kate Leonard with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Kate Leonard more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Kate Leonard
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Kate Leonard. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Kate Leonard. The network helps show where Jane Kate Leonard may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside Jane Kate Leonard, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1974 | 33 | |
| 2 | 1984 | 20 | |
| 3 | 1998 | 17 | |
| 4 | 1984 | 11 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 11 | |
| 6 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 10 | 1972 | 2 | |
| 11 | 1984 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2002 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1983 | 1 |
About Jane Kate Leonard
Jane Kate Leonard is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Cultural Studies, Anthropology, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Infectious Diseases, having authored 14 papers that have together received 112 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (9 papers), Japanese History and Culture (6 papers), Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (4 papers), Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (3 papers), Hong Kong and Taiwan Politics (1 paper), Economic Zones and Regional Development (1 paper) and Asian Studies and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Cultural Studies (34 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (12 citations), Anthropology (21 citations), Sociology and Political Science (85 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (34 citations). Jane Kate Leonard has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Philip A. Kuhn, R. Keith Schoppa and John R. Watt. Their work appears in journals such as The American Historical Review, Modern Asian Studies, Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, The Journal of Asian Studies and China review international.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.