Jane Hook
- Reproductive Medicine top 0.5%
- Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment 12
- Obstetrics and Gynecology top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies 6
- Oncology top 10%
- Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers 4
- CAR-T cell therapy research 3
- Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas 2
-
- Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment 6
-
- Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments 3
-
- Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics 3
- Co-authors
- Timothy PerrenM MascarenhasSelina BannooStephen DobbsMatthew NankivellGordon C. JaysonJeremy TwiggDavid Luesley
- Journals
- Journal of Clinical Oncology (7 papers)Annals of Oncology (5 papers)European Journal of Cancer (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomNetherlandsAustralia
In The Last Decade
Jane Hook
22 papers receiving 1.5k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Reproductive Medicine 1.0k
- Obstetrics and Gynecology 486
- Surgery 706
- Oncology 417
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 292
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Hook
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Hook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Hook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Hook more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Hook
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Hook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Hook. The network helps show where Jane Hook may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Hook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2021 | 18 | |
| 4 | 2020 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2020 | 17 | |
| 6 | 2020 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2019 | 13 | |
| 8 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 9 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 10 | Primary chemotherapy versus primary surgery for newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (CHORUS): an open-label, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority trialbreakdown → | 2015 | 945 |
| 11 | 2015 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2014 | 22 | |
| 13 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 14 | 2013 | 11 | |
| 15 | 2011 | 40 | |
| 16 | 2011 | 16 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 156 | |
| 18 | 2008 | 71 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 18 | |
| 20 | 2007 | 67 |
About Jane Hook
Jane Hook is a scholar working on Reproductive Medicine, Cancer Research, Oncology, Obstetrics and Gynecology and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 25 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ovarian cancer diagnosis and treatment (12 papers), Intraperitoneal and Appendiceal Malignancies (6 papers), Sarcoma Diagnosis and Treatment (6 papers), Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers (4 papers), CAR-T cell therapy research (3 papers), Bone Tumor Diagnosis and Treatments (3 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (3 papers) and Vascular Tumors and Angiosarcomas (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Reproductive Medicine (1.0k citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (486 citations), Surgery (706 citations), Oncology (417 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (292 citations). Jane Hook has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Netherlands and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Timothy Perren, M Mascarenhas, Selina Bannoo, Stephen Dobbs, Matthew Nankivell, Gordon C. Jayson, Jeremy Twigg, David Luesley, Jonathan Herod and Sean Kehoe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Clinical Oncology, Annals of Oncology, European Journal of Cancer, Gynecologic Oncology and British Journal of Cancer.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.