Jane Haggis
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Demography top 10%
- Gender Studies top 10%
- Education
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Susanne SchechGlen ElderMargaret AllenLenore MandersonKalpana RamMargaret JollyMaila StivensSanti Rozario
- Topics
- Australian History and Society (4 papers)Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers)Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers)
- Cited by
- DevelopmentGender StudiesDemography
- Partner nations
- AustraliaUnited KingdomIndia
In The Last Decade
Jane Haggis
27 papers receiving 316 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 80
- Sociology and Political Science 239
- Demography 66
- Gender Studies 55
- Education 53
- Anthropology 52
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Haggis
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Haggis's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Haggis with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Haggis more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Haggis
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Haggis. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Haggis. The network helps show where Jane Haggis may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Haggis
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Haggis. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Haggis based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Haggis. Jane Haggis is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | True Friends or False? The changing nature of relationships between Indian and British missionary women in the imperial contact zone of India, c1880-1940 | 0 |
| 5 | 15 | |
| 6 | The feminist research process: defining a topic | 0 |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | In relationship with Indigenous Sovereignty | 0 |
| 9 | 15 | |
| 10 | Using electronic literature in online learning and teaching | 2 |
| 11 | Development : a cultural studies reader | 33 |
| 12 | 124 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 25 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Jane Haggis
Jane Haggis is a scholar working on Religious studies, History and Communication, having authored 31 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Australian History and Society (4 papers), Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (3 papers) and Critical Race Theory in Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Development (26 citations), Gender Studies (55 citations) and Demography (66 citations). Jane Haggis has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United Kingdom and India. Frequent co-authors include Susanne Schech, Glen Elder, Margaret Allen, Lenore Manderson, Kalpana Ram, Margaret Jolly, Maila Stivens, Santi Rozario, Mary Holmes and Sophia Rainbird. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, Economic Geography and Environment and Planning D Society and Space.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.