Jane Gillette

1.8k citations
10 papers · 1.3k · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Gillette

9 papers receiving 1.3k citations

Peers

Jane Gillette
Comparison fields: 5 of 92
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 529
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 368
  • Neurology 188
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 414
  • Physiology 297
Replace Naida L. Graham with:
Naida L. Graham Canada
Olivier Moreaud France
Clare Galton United Kingdom
Samrah Ahmed United Kingdom
José Barroso Spain
Peter Goulding United Kingdom
S. Ahmad Sajjadi United States
Thomas M.H. Hope United Kingdom
Jing Yu China
Richard L. Strub United States
Jane Gillette relative to Naida L. Graham Canada Naida L. Graham's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.0×
Naida L. Graham · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Gillette

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Gillette's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Gillette with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Gillette more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Gillette

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Gillette. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Gillette. The network helps show where Jane Gillette may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Gillette, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Gillette Line = papers co-authored together Jane Gillette links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
#Work
1 1995441
2 1999411
3
Lack of age-related differences in temporal lobe volume of very healthy adults.
199494
4 199389
5 199284
6 199274
7 199371
8 199666
9
Human simulations of lexical acquisition
19998
10
Acquisition of the lexicon: Limits of word to world pairing procedures
20010

About Jane Gillette

Jane Gillette is a scholar working on Psychiatry and Mental health, Cognitive Neuroscience, Physiology, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Health, Toxicology and Mutagenesis, having authored 10 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research (6 papers), Alzheimer's disease research and treatments (3 papers), Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications (2 papers), Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (2 papers), Health, Environment, Cognitive Aging (2 papers), Language Development and Disorders (2 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (1 paper) and Intracerebral and Subarachnoid Hemorrhage Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (529 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (368 citations), Neurology (188 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (414 citations) and Physiology (297 citations). Jane Gillette has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Henry Gleitman, Lila R. Gleitman, Declan Murphy, С. И. Рапопорт, Judith A. Salerno, James V. Haxby, M. B. Schapiro, Charles DeCarli, Mark B. Schapiro and C. L. Grady. Their work appears in journals such as Neurology, Biological Psychiatry, Journal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, Cognition and American Journal of Neuroradiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact