Bo Mou

411 citations
43 papers · 174 indexed · h-index 7

Impact in

    • Indian and Buddhist Studies
  • Philosophy top 5%
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy
    • Classical Philosophy and Thought

Papers in

    • Classical Philosophy and Thought 6
    • Medieval and Classical Philosophy 4
    • Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 3
    • Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education 2
    • Indian and Buddhist Studies 4

Bo Mou

33 papers receiving 135 citations

Peers

Bo Mou
Comparison fields: 5 of 48
  • Religious studies 41
  • Philosophy 54
  • Sociology and Political Science 80
  • History and Philosophy of Science 8
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 21
Replace Chris Fraser with:
Chris Fraser Hong Kong
Victoria S. Harrison United Kingdom
Mark Wynn United Kingdom
Purushottama Bilimoria Australia
William Desmond Belgium
Thomas F. Cleary
K. N. Jayatilleke
Keiji Nishitani Japan
Jane Geaney United States
John A. Taber United States
Bo Mou relative to Chris Fraser Hong Kong Chris Fraser's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Chris Fraser · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Bo Mou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Bo Mou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Bo Mou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Bo Mou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Bo Mou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Bo Mou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Bo Mou. The network helps show where Bo Mou may publish in the future.

No co-authors to show.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20231
2 20222
3 20172
4 20152
5 20151
6
Optimum Design for Slider of JA39-1200E Press
20121
7 20111
8 20101
9
On Some Methodological Issues Concerning Chinese Philosophy
20096
10
History of Chinese Philosophy
200842
11
On Constructive-Engagement Strategy in Comparative Philosophy
200811
12
Searle's philosophy and Chinese philosophy : constructive engagement
20083
13 20073
14
Davidson’s Philosophy and Chinese Philosophy: Constructive Engagement
20065
15
Chinese Philosophy: Language and Logic
20062
16
Becoming-Being Complementarity: An Account of the Yin-Yang Metaphysical Vision of the Yi-Jing
20033
17
Two Roads to Wisdom? –--Chinese and Analytic Philosophical Traditions
200120
18 20015
19 19990
20 199910

About Bo Mou

Bo Mou is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Political Science and International Relations and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 43 papers that have together received 174 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Chinese history and philosophy (11 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (6 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (4 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (4 papers), Medieval and Classical Philosophy (4 papers), Indian and Buddhist Studies (4 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (3 papers) and Pragmatism in Philosophy and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Religious studies (41 citations), Philosophy (54 citations), Sociology and Political Science (80 citations), History and Philosophy of Science (8 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (21 citations). Bo Mou has collaborated with scholars based in United States and China. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy East and West, History and Philosophy of Logic, Synthese, Metaphilosophy and Asian Philosophy.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026