Jane Farley

875 total citations
9 papers, 685 citations indexed

About

Jane Farley is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Genetics and Reproductive Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Jane Farley has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 685 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 5 papers in Genetics and 5 papers in Reproductive Medicine. Recurrent topics in Jane Farley's work include Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers). Jane Farley is often cited by papers focused on Reproductive Biology and Fertility (6 papers), Sperm and Testicular Function (4 papers) and Animal Genetics and Reproduction (3 papers). Jane Farley collaborates with scholars based in United States. Jane Farley's co-authors include Jorge Sztein, Larry E. Mobraaten, Hope O. Sweet, Thomas L.Greenbaum, Edward F. McQuarrie, Michael V. Wiles, G. Charles Ostermeier, Robert A. Taft, L E Mobraaten and John J. Eppig and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Marketing Research and Human Reproduction.

In The Last Decade

Jane Farley

9 papers receiving 648 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Jane Farley United States	9	442	328	246	200	49	9	685
James F. Evans United States	13	386 0.9×	266 0.8×	174 0.7×	95 0.5×	14 0.3×	46	945
Francisco Crespo Spain	16	432 1.0×	513 1.6×	219 0.9×	111 0.6×	74 1.5×	70	985
P. Terriou France	16	558 1.3×	675 2.1×	246 1.0×	262 1.3×	5 0.1×	24	1.0k
Carin Huyser South Africa	14	301 0.7×	303 0.9×	41 0.2×	103 0.5×	23 0.5×	38	618
Carole C. Wegner United States	10	200 0.5×	292 0.9×	101 0.4×	119 0.6×	25 0.5×	14	533
Mathew Tomlinson United Kingdom	14	508 1.1×	669 2.0×	58 0.2×	81 0.4×	28 0.6×	30	790
Sergey I. Moskovtsev Canada	24	998 2.3×	1.3k 3.9×	242 1.0×	337 1.7×	43 0.9×	51	1.6k
G. David Ball United States	21	1.3k 3.0×	1.3k 4.0×	178 0.7×	182 0.9×	78 1.6×	53	1.7k
William Gibbons United States	17	465 1.1×	611 1.9×	58 0.2×	90 0.5×	5 0.1×	51	991
Haim Yavetz Israel	24	660 1.5×	1.1k 3.3×	545 2.2×	543 2.7×	28 0.6×	71	1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Farley

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Farley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Farley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Farley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Farley

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Farley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Farley. The network helps show where Jane Farley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Farley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Farley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Farley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Farley. Jane Farley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Ostermeier, G. Charles, Michael V. Wiles, Jane Farley, & Robert A. Taft. (2008). Conserving, Distributing and Managing Genetically Modified Mouse Lines by Sperm Cryopreservation. PLoS ONE. 3(7). e2792–e2792. 94 indexed citations

2.

Davisson, Muriel T., Ellen C. Akeson, Cecilia Schmidt, et al.. (2006). Impact of trisomy on fertility and meiosis in male mice. Human Reproduction. 22(2). 468–476. 10 indexed citations

3.

Sztein, Jorge, et al.. (2001). Comparison of Permeating and Nonpermeating Cryoprotectants for Mouse Sperm Cryopreservation. Cryobiology. 42(1). 28–39. 88 indexed citations

4.

Sztein, Jorge, Jane Farley, & Larry E. Mobraaten. (2000). In Vitro Fertilization with Cryopreserved Inbred Mouse Sperm1. Biology of Reproduction. 63(6). 1774–1780. 154 indexed citations

5.

Sztein, Jorge, Marilyn J. O’Brien, Jane Farley, Larry E. Mobraaten, & John J. Eppig. (2000). Rescue of oocytes from antral follicles of cryopreserved mouse ovaries: competence to undergo maturation, embryogenesis, and development to term. Human Reproduction. 15(3). 567–571. 26 indexed citations

6.

Sztein, Jorge, Hope O. Sweet, Jane Farley, & Larry E. Mobraaten. (1998). Cryopreservation and Orthotopic Transplantation of Mouse Ovaries: New Approach in Gamete Banking1. Biology of Reproduction. 58(4). 1071–1074. 132 indexed citations

7.

Sztein, Jorge, et al.. (1997). Motility of Cryopreserved Mouse Spermatozoa Affected by Temperature of Collection and Rate of Thawing. Cryobiology. 35(1). 46–52. 65 indexed citations

8.

Farley, Jane, et al.. (1994). DEVELOPMENT OF HANSENULA ANOMALA INFECTION IN A CHILD RECEIVING FLUCONAZOLE THERAPY. The Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal. 13(2). 158–158. 20 indexed citations

9.

McQuarrie, Edward F., Thomas L.Greenbaum, & Jane Farley. (1989). The Practical Handbook and Guide to Focus Group Research. Journal of Marketing Research. 26(1). 121–121. 96 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact