Jane Douglas
Impact in
- Human-Computer Interaction top 10%
- Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
- Literature and Literary Theory top 10%
- Digital Humanities and Scholarship
Papers in
-
- Digital Communication and Language 2
- Co-authors
- Andrew HargadonJohn W. PetersenBaharak MoshireeAshay D. BhatwadekarMohan K. RaizadaAlan W. StittLynn C. ShawMaria B. Grant
- Journals
- International Nursing Review (1 paper)TDR/The Drama Review (1 paper)Leonardo (1 paper)Social Science Computer Review (1 paper)Nurse Education Today (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Jane Douglas
17 papers receiving 235 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 96
- Human-Computer Interaction 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 42
- Communication 21
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 37
- Computer Science Applications 15
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Douglas
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Douglas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Douglas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Douglas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Douglas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Douglas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Douglas. The network helps show where Jane Douglas may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 17 scholars most cited alongside Jane Douglas, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2019 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 5 | 2016 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 47 | |
| 9 | 2005 | 12 | |
| 10 | 2001 | 70 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 37 | |
| 12 | Abandoning the either/or for the and/and/and: Hypertext and the art of argumentative writing | 1996 | 1 |
| 13 | 1996 | 2 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 8 | |
| 16 | Print pathways and interactive labyrinths : how hypertext narratives affect the act of reading | 1993 | 6 |
| 17 | 1993 | 6 | |
| 18 | Understanding the Act of Reading: the WOE Beginner's Guide to Dissection. | 1991 | 9 |
| 19 | 1990 | 6 |
About Jane Douglas
Jane Douglas is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design, Communication, Visual Arts and Performing Arts and Radiological and Ultrasound Technology, having authored 19 papers that have together received 268 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Digital Games and Media (6 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (2 papers), Digital Communication and Language (2 papers), Media, Communication, and Education (2 papers), Cinema and Media Studies (2 papers), Migration, Aging, and Tourism Studies (1 paper), Gastrointestinal motility and disorders (1 paper) and Health and Well-being Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (42 citations), Communication (21 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (37 citations) and Computer Science Applications (15 citations). Jane Douglas has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Andrew Hargadon, John W. Petersen, Baharak Moshiree, Ashay D. Bhatwadekar, Mohan K. Raizada, Alan W. Stitt, Lynn C. Shaw, Maria B. Grant, Sergio Caballero and Sergio Li Calzi. Their work appears in journals such as International Nursing Review, TDR/The Drama Review, Leonardo, Social Science Computer Review and Nurse Education Today.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.