Jane Chambers‐Evans
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Surgery
- Clinical Psychology
- Emergency Medicine
- Co-authors
- Carolyn EllsMatthew HuntFranco A. CarnevaleSam D. ShemieWilliam WallGreg KnollKimberly YoungWalter Glannon
- Topics
- Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers)Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers)Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited States
In The Last Decade
Jane Chambers‐Evans
11 papers receiving 351 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 64
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 259
- General Health Professions 105
- Surgery 102
- Clinical Psychology 68
- Emergency Medicine 34
Countries citing papers authored by Jane Chambers‐Evans
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Chambers‐Evans's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Chambers‐Evans with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Chambers‐Evans more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Chambers‐Evans
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Chambers‐Evans. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Chambers‐Evans. The network helps show where Jane Chambers‐Evans may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jane Chambers‐Evans
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jane Chambers‐Evans. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jane Chambers‐Evans based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jane Chambers‐Evans. Jane Chambers‐Evans is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 14 | |
| 4 | 31 | |
| 5 | 86 | |
| 6 | The consultation component of the clinical nurse specialist role. | 5 |
| 7 | Building a successful DCD program: planning and leading change. | 0 |
| 8 | 160 | |
| 9 | 0 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | The family as window onto the world of the patient: involving patients and families in the decision-making process. | 9 |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 6 |
About Jane Chambers‐Evans
Jane Chambers‐Evans is a scholar working on Research and Theory, General Health Professions and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 14 papers that have together received 373 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Palliative Care and End-of-Life Issues (5 papers), Organ Donation and Transplantation (4 papers) and Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Research and Theory (25 citations), Transplantation (29 citations) and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (259 citations). Jane Chambers‐Evans has collaborated with scholars based in Canada and United States. Frequent co-authors include Carolyn Ells, Matthew Hunt, Franco A. Carnevale, Sam D. Shemie, William Wall, Greg Knoll, Kimberly Young, Walter Glannon, Stéphan Langevin and Graeme Rocker. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Advanced Nursing, Canadian Medical Association Journal and Journal of Clinical Nursing.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.