Jane Beenstock

513 citations
18 papers · 299 · h-index 8

Impact in

Papers in

Jane Beenstock

16 papers receiving 290 citations

Peers

Jane Beenstock
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Applied Psychology 74
  • General Health Professions 131
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 61
  • Research and Theory 3
  • Social Psychology 57
Replace Jilly Martin with:
Jilly Martin United Kingdom
Sabrina Voci Canada
Terri Rodak Canada
Christopher C. Wagner United States
Dominique Alexandra Reinwand Germany
Marie‐Jet Bekkers United Kingdom
Carmen Beatrice Dogaru Romania
Barry Nierenberg United States
Emma Rossnagel Canada
Benjamin B. Brodey United States
Jane Beenstock relative to Jilly Martin United Kingdom Jilly Martin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.5×
Jilly Martin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Jane Beenstock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jane Beenstock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane Beenstock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane Beenstock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jane Beenstock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane Beenstock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane Beenstock. The network helps show where Jane Beenstock may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Jane Beenstock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Jane Beenstock Line = papers co-authored together Jane Beenstock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
#Work
1 201299
2 201083
3 201822
4 202021
5 201416
6 202311
7 20149
8 20208
9 20126
10 20215
11 20185
12 20225
13 20013
14
This little trust went to market.
19962
15 20202
16
Primary care groups. Time to shape up.
20001
17 20201
18 20220

About Jane Beenstock

Jane Beenstock is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Clinical Psychology, Social Psychology, Applied Psychology and Physiology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 299 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Schizophrenia research and treatment (3 papers), Health Policy Implementation Science (3 papers), Psychological and Temporal Perspectives Research (2 papers), Health, psychology, and well-being (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (2 papers), Mental Health and Patient Involvement (2 papers), Agriculture Sustainability and Environmental Impact (2 papers) and Primary Care and Health Outcomes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (74 citations), General Health Professions (131 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (61 citations), Research and Theory (3 citations) and Social Psychology (57 citations). Jane Beenstock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Martin White, Jean Adams, Ruth Bell, Falko F. Sniehotta, Eugene Milne, Vera Araújo‐Soares, Jo Hart, Sarah Peters, Anna Chisholm and Lucie Byrne‐Davis. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Public Health, Alcohol and Alcoholism, BMC Health Services Research, European Journal of Public Health and Implementation Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact