Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks
2004768 citationsAino Halinen, Jan‐Åke TörnroosJournal of Business Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Jan‐Åke Törnroos
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan‐Åke Törnroos's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan‐Åke Törnroos with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan‐Åke Törnroos more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan‐Åke Törnroos
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan‐Åke Törnroos. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan‐Åke Törnroos. The network helps show where Jan‐Åke Törnroos may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan‐Åke Törnroos
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan‐Åke Törnroos.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan‐Åke Törnroos based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan‐Åke Törnroos. Jan‐Åke Törnroos is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Medlin, Christopher J. & Jan‐Åke Törnroos. (2015). IMP Conference 2015 Competitive Track Interacting for legitimacy: A dynamic perspective on institutionalization in business networks.1 indexed citations
Halinen, Aino, Christopher J. Medlin, & Jan‐Åke Törnroos. (2012). Time and process in business network research. Industrial Marketing Management. 41(2). 215–223.155 indexed citations
13.
Medlin, Christopher J. & Jan‐Åke Törnroos. (2010). Inter-firm interaction: The human role in change and stability. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).2 indexed citations
14.
Elo, Maria, Aino Halinen, & Jan‐Åke Törnroos. (2010). Process Research in Business Networks – An Event-based Method for Qualitative Analysis.10 indexed citations
Medlin, Christopher J. & Jan‐Åke Törnroos. (2007). Inter-firm interaction from a human perspective. Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide).15 indexed citations
Törnroos, Jan‐Åke. (2004). Terminating relationships in business networks? Reflections on business strategy Competitive Paper for the 20th Annual Conference of the Industrial Marketing and Purchasing (IMP) Group Conference, 24 th September, Copenhagen 2004.6 indexed citations
19.
Halinen, Aino & Jan‐Åke Törnroos. (2004). Using case methods in the study of contemporary business networks. Journal of Business Research. 58(9). 1285–1297.768 indexed citations breakdown →
20.
Törnroos, Jan‐Åke, et al.. (1997). The Role of Learning in the Evolution of Business Networks in Estonia: Four Finnish Case Studies.7 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.