Jan van Laarhoven
- Neurology top 10%
- Neurology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
- Co-authors
- Isidoor O. BergfeldGuus BeutePepijn van den MunckhofDamiaan DenysPeter NottenFerdinand HorstHenricus G. RuhéMechteld L.C. Hoogendoorn
- Topics
- Neurological disorders and treatments (5 papers)Medieval Literature and History (3 papers)Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers)
- Cited by
- NeurologyCognitive Neuroscience
- Journals
- The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & MetabolismPsychological MedicineMolecular Psychiatry
- Partner nations
- NetherlandsUnited StatesCuracao
In The Last Decade
Jan van Laarhoven
8 papers receiving 283 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 52
- Neurology 183
- Neurology 101
- Cognitive Neuroscience 68
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 62
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 50
Countries citing papers authored by Jan van Laarhoven
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan van Laarhoven's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan van Laarhoven with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan van Laarhoven more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jan van Laarhoven
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan van Laarhoven. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan van Laarhoven. The network helps show where Jan van Laarhoven may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan van Laarhoven
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan van Laarhoven. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan van Laarhoven based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jan van Laarhoven. Jan van Laarhoven is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 197 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 14 | |
| 12 | John of Salisbury's Entheticus maior and minor | 2 |
| 13 | 39 | |
| 14 | 0 | |
| 15 | 0 |
About Jan van Laarhoven
Jan van Laarhoven is a scholar working on Classics, Neurology and Neurology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 291 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neurological disorders and treatments (5 papers), Medieval Literature and History (3 papers) and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Neurology (101 citations), Neurology (183 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (68 citations). Jan van Laarhoven has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Curacao. Frequent co-authors include Isidoor O. Bergfeld, Guus Beute, Pepijn van den Munckhof, Damiaan Denys, Peter Notten, Ferdinand Horst, Henricus G. Ruhé, Mechteld L.C. Hoogendoorn, Bart P. de Kwaasteniet and Rick Schuurman. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, Psychological Medicine and Molecular Psychiatry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.