Guido van Wingen

13.1k citations
188 papers · 7.0k indexed · h-index 50

Guido van Wingen

175 papers receiving 6.9k citations

Peers

Guido van Wingen
Comparison fields: 5 of 145
  • Behavioral Neuroscience 1.6k
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 3.3k
  • Biological Psychiatry 331
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.7k
  • Clinical Psychology 1.6k
Replace James L. Abelson with:
James L. Abelson United States
Emily Stern United States
René Hurlemann Germany
Jon‐Kar Zubieta United States
Jennifer Keller United States
Volker Arolt Germany
Udo Dannlowski Germany
Heather A. Kenna United States
Peter Zwanzger Germany
Avram J. Holmes United States
Guido van Wingen relative to James L. Abelson United States James L. Abelson's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
James L. Abelson · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Guido van Wingen

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Guido van Wingen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Guido van Wingen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Guido van Wingen more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Guido van Wingen

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Guido van Wingen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Guido van Wingen. The network helps show where Guido van Wingen may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Guido van Wingen, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Guido van Wingen Line = papers co-authored together Guido van Wingen links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20250
2 20250
3 20251
4 20250
5 20241
6 20245
7 20240
8 202310
9 20237
10 202214
11 202136
12 202014
13 202032
14 201928
15 201742
16 2015204
17
Striatal Dopamine D-2/3 Receptor Availability in Treatment Resistant Depression (vol 9, e113612, 2014)
20151
18 201577
19 201563
20 200951

About Guido van Wingen

Guido van Wingen is a scholar working on Behavioral Neuroscience, Cognitive Neuroscience and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 188 papers that have together received 7.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (67 papers), Treatment of Major Depression (29 papers), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (28 papers), Stress Responses and Cortisol (27 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (25 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (21 papers), Neurological disorders and treatments (19 papers) and Electroconvulsive Therapy Studies (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Behavioral Neuroscience (1.6k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (3.3k citations) and Biological Psychiatry (331 citations). Guido van Wingen has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Guillén Fernández, Damiaan Denys, Torbjörn Bäckström, Robbert J. Verkes, Jan K. Buitelaar, Erno J. Hermans, Marloes J. A. G. Henckens, Lindsey Ossewaarde, Marian Joëls and Indira Tendolkar. Their work appears in journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neuroscience and Nature Neuroscience.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026