Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language
19873.0k citationsP Beauvais, Randolph Quirk et al.College Composition and Communicationprofile →
A Grammar of Contemporary English
19741.0k citationsRandolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum et al.Modern Language Journalprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Jan Svartvik's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jan Svartvik with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jan Svartvik more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jan Svartvik. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jan Svartvik. The network helps show where Jan Svartvik may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jan Svartvik
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jan Svartvik.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jan Svartvik based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Jan Svartvik. Jan Svartvik is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Leech, Geoffrey, et al.. (2016). A comprehensive grammar of the English language. By RANDOLPH QUIRK, SID-.1 indexed citations
2.
Svartvik, Jan & Geoffrey Leech. (2016). English. Palgrave Macmillan UK eBooks.2 indexed citations
Svartvik, Jan. (1999). Engelska : öspråk, världsspråk, trendspråk. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
5.
Svartvik, Jan, et al.. (1996). Words : proceedings of an international symposium, Lund, 25-26 August 1995. Medical Entomology and Zoology.4 indexed citations
6.
Vann, Roberta J., Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik. (1995). A Communicative Grammar of English. Modern Language Journal. 79(3). 441–441.260 indexed citations
7.
Svartvik, Jan. (1991). English Computer Corpora: Selected Papers and Research Guide.15 indexed citations
8.
Greenbaum, Sidney & Jan Svartvik. (1990). The London-Lund corpus of spoken english.38 indexed citations
9.
Svartvik, Jan. (1990). The London–Lund corpus of spoken English : Description and research. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 82.83 indexed citations
10.
Beauvais, P, Randolph Quirk, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, & Jan Svartvik. (1987). A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. College Composition and Communication. 38(2). 225–225.2988 indexed citations breakdown →
11.
Svartvik, Jan. (1982). Survey of spoken English : report on research, 1975-81.10 indexed citations
12.
Svartvik, Jan & Randolph Quirk. (1980). A Corpus of English Conversation. Medical Entomology and Zoology.242 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.