James T. Parker
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Joseph R. FerrariAlice F. HealyLyle E. BourneDavid HavasErica L. WohldmannColleen Crittenden MurrayCatherine N. RasberryCatherine A. Lesesne
- Topics
- Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers)Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers)Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Experimental and Cognitive PsychologyClinical PsychologyDevelopmental and Educational Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesItalyGermany
In The Last Decade
James T. Parker
19 papers receiving 310 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Clinical Psychology 121
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 102
- Social Psychology 72
- Cognitive Neuroscience 71
- Education 63
Countries citing papers authored by James T. Parker
This map shows the geographic impact of James T. Parker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James T. Parker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James T. Parker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James T. Parker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James T. Parker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James T. Parker. The network helps show where James T. Parker may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James T. Parker
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James T. Parker. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James T. Parker based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James T. Parker. James T. Parker is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 13 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 31 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 39 | |
| 10 | 16 | |
| 11 | 13 | |
| 12 | 2 | |
| 13 | 38 | |
| 14 | 15 | |
| 15 | Academic procrastination: Personality correlates with Myers-Briggs types, self-efficacy, and academic locus of control. | 108 |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | Modeling a Future for Adult Basic Education. | 0 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About James T. Parker
James T. Parker is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Speech and Hearing, having authored 20 papers that have together received 361 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Memory Processes and Influences (5 papers), Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (4 papers) and Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (102 citations), Clinical Psychology (121 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (57 citations). James T. Parker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Italy and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Joseph R. Ferrari, Alice F. Healy, Lyle E. Bourne, David Havas, Erica L. Wohldmann, Colleen Crittenden Murray, Catherine N. Rasberry, Catherine A. Lesesne, India D. Rose and Leigh E. Szucs. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Memory and Language, Journal of Adolescent Health and Teaching and Teacher Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.