James Rose

511 total citations
9 papers, 385 citations indexed

About

James Rose is a scholar working on Biomaterials, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. According to data from OpenAlex, James Rose has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 385 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Biomaterials, 3 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and 3 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging. Recurrent topics in James Rose's work include Corneal Surgery and Treatments (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers). James Rose is often cited by papers focused on Corneal Surgery and Treatments (3 papers), Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers) and Biomedical Ethics and Regulation (2 papers). James Rose collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Italy and Canada. James Rose's co-authors include Andrew Hopkinson, Alicia J. El Haj, Lisa J. White, Harminder S. Dua, Felicity R. A. J. Rose, Settimio Pacelli, Laura E. Sidney, Siobhán E. Dunphy, Samantha L. Wilson and Colin A. Espie and has published in prestigious journals such as Materials, Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A and Journal of Functional Biomaterials.

In The Last Decade

James Rose

8 papers receiving 379 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
James Rose United Kingdom	5	191	145	101	82	59	9	385
Gurpreet Chouhan United Kingdom	7	117 0.6×	104 0.7×	83 0.8×	43 0.5×	73 1.2×	7	430
Samiramis Pourmotabed Iran	8	198 1.0×	148 1.0×	47 0.5×	52 0.6×	26 0.4×	10	377
Raquel Hernáez‐Moya Spain	9	94 0.5×	95 0.7×	87 0.9×	38 0.5×	81 1.4×	10	303
Zhongmou Sun United States	8	104 0.5×	76 0.5×	169 1.7×	92 1.1×	136 2.3×	15	447
Corinne Illoul France	7	176 0.9×	173 1.2×	30 0.3×	46 0.6×	21 0.4×	7	331
Amin Orash Mahmoud Salehi Iran	10	294 1.5×	262 1.8×	77 0.8×	45 0.5×	27 0.5×	14	495
Jui‐Hsiang Chen Taiwan	8	194 1.0×	194 1.3×	31 0.3×	101 1.2×	26 0.4×	15	380
Chaozhong Yang China	9	128 0.7×	82 0.6×	206 2.0×	23 0.3×	106 1.8×	11	403
Zixin He Canada	9	90 0.5×	158 1.1×	53 0.5×	39 0.5×	39 0.7×	14	418
Britt ter Horst United Kingdom	8	87 0.5×	87 0.6×	33 0.3×	69 0.8×	11 0.2×	8	399

Countries citing papers authored by James Rose

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Rose's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Rose with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Rose more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Rose

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Rose. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Rose. The network helps show where James Rose may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Rose

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Rose. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Rose based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Rose. James Rose is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Richards, Georgia C., et al.. (2022). Artificial intelligence and opioid use: a narrative review. BMJ Innovations. 9(2). 78–96. 5 indexed citations

2.

Richards, Georgia C., et al.. (2022). Artificial intelligence and opioid use: a narrative review. medRxiv.

3.

Stott, Richard, et al.. (2020). Determinants of and barriers to adoption of digital therapeutics for mental health at scale in the NHS. BMJ Innovations. 6(3). 92–98. 22 indexed citations

4.

Rose, James, Laura E. Sidney, Lisa J. White, et al.. (2018). In vitro evaluation of electrospun blends of gelatin and PCL for application as a partial thickness corneal graft. Journal of Biomedical Materials Research Part A. 107(4). 828–838. 25 indexed citations

5.

Rose, James, Michael May, & David Williams. (2015). Determinants of Clinician Adoption of Regenerative Therapies in the Uk and Canada: An Ophthalmology Perspective. Regenerative Medicine. 10(4). 481–493. 1 indexed citations

6.

Rose, James, Settimio Pacelli, Alicia J. El Haj, et al.. (2014). Gelatin-Based Materials in Ocular Tissue Engineering. Materials. 7(4). 3106–3135. 257 indexed citations

7.

Wilson, Samantha L., Laura E. Sidney, Siobhán E. Dunphy, James Rose, & Andrew Hopkinson. (2013). Keeping an Eye on Decellularized Corneas: A Review of Methods, Characterization and Applications. Journal of Functional Biomaterials. 4(3). 114–161. 71 indexed citations

8.

Rose, James & David Williams. (2012). The UK Relative to Other Single Payer-Dominated Healthcare Markets for Regenerative Medicine Therapies. Regenerative Medicine. 7(3). 429–438. 3 indexed citations

9.

Rose, James. (1995). A Study of the Factors Associated with Successful Technology Transfer and their Applicability to Air Force Technology Transfers.. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact