Richard Stott
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 2%
- Applied Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Co-authors
- Anke EhlersNick GreyDavid M. ClarkJennifer WildAnn HackmannAnna LavenderBirgit KleimSheena Liness
- Topics
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers)Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (10 papers)Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Richard Stott
45 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 105
- Clinical Psychology 803
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 475
- Applied Psychology 228
- Social Psychology 181
- Cognitive Neuroscience 153
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Stott
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Stott's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Stott with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Stott more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Stott
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Stott. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Stott. The network helps show where Richard Stott may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Stott
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Stott. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Stott based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Stott. Richard Stott is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 42 | |
| 5 | 24 | |
| 6 | 13 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 19 | |
| 9 | 26 | |
| 10 | 28 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 27 | |
| 13 | 36 | |
| 14 | Cognitive change predicts symptom improvement in cognitive therapy for PTSD | 2 |
| 15 | 41 | |
| 16 | 98 | |
| 17 | 149 | |
| 18 | The Clerk's Tale: Young Men and Moral Life in Nineteenth-Century America | 6 |
| 19 | 26 | |
| 20 | 10 |
About Richard Stott
Richard Stott is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 52 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (10 papers), Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research (10 papers) and Digital Mental Health Interventions (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (228 citations), Clinical Psychology (803 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (475 citations). Richard Stott has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Anke Ehlers, Nick Grey, David M. Clark, Jennifer Wild, Ann Hackmann, Anna Lavender, Birgit Kleim, Sheena Liness, Idit Albert and Alicia Deale. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, American Journal of Psychiatry and Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.