James R. Wright

38 papers receiving 297 citations

Peers

James R. Wright
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 79
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 26
  • History 28
  • Neurology 35
  • Immunology 44
Replace Konstantinos Laios with:
Konstantinos Laios Greece
Keith L. Blauer United States
Valentina Esposito Italy
Khaled Mohamed Ragab Egypt
Stefano Gigli Italy
Guangyu He China
Xiaoyan Xing China
Mehmet Saldır Türkiye
Mervat M. El-Eshmawy Egypt
Oriana Capri Italy
James R. Wright relative to Konstantinos Laios Greece Konstantinos Laios's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×8.8×
Konstantinos Laios · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James R. Wright

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Wright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James R. Wright

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Wright. The network helps show where James R. Wright may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside James R. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James R. Wright Line = papers co-authored together James R. Wright links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 42 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Influence of age and previous use of diazepam dosage required for endoscopy.
197851
2 200850
3 200532
4
Almost famous: E. Clark Noble, the common thread in the discovery of insulin and vinblastine.
200221
5 197220
6 202014
7 202213
8
The use of jet-injectors in BCG vaccination.
197013
9 20197
10 20167
11 20196
12 20216
13 20216
14 20186
15 20205
16 20185
17 20184
18 20224
19 20184
20 20174

About James R. Wright

James R. Wright is a scholar working on History, Neurology, Obstetrics and Gynecology, Space and Planetary Science and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 42 papers that have together received 311 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include History of Medical Practice (17 papers), Medical History and Innovations (12 papers), Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies (7 papers), Diabetes Management and Research (5 papers), Health and Medical Research Impacts (5 papers), Medical History and Research (5 papers), Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics (4 papers) and Reproductive System and Pregnancy (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (79 citations), Obstetrics and Gynecology (26 citations), History (28 citations), Neurology (35 citations) and Immunology (44 citations). James R. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include David Russell‐Jones, Sorcha MacLeod, Edward M. Sellers, P. W. Kent, Nathan Hoeldtke, Peter G. Napolitano, Andrea Shields, Bobby Howard, Edwin Gale and Lynn McIntyre. Their work appears in journals such as Pediatric and Developmental Pathology, Clinical Anatomy, Archives of Pathology & Laboratory Medicine, Placenta and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026