James R. Bright

562 total citations
15 papers, 354 citations indexed

About

James R. Bright is a scholar working on Management Science and Operations Research, Management of Technology and Innovation and Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. According to data from OpenAlex, James R. Bright has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 354 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 2 papers in Management Science and Operations Research, 1 paper in Management of Technology and Innovation and 1 paper in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality. Recurrent topics in James R. Bright's work include Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (2 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (1 paper) and Economic and Technological Systems Analysis (1 paper). James R. Bright is often cited by papers focused on Innovation Diffusion and Forecasting (2 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (1 paper) and Economic and Technological Systems Analysis (1 paper). James R. Bright collaborates with scholars based in United States. James R. Bright's co-authors include Jim Bright, Fiona Jones and James Brian Quinn and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series and Long Range Planning.

In The Last Decade

James R. Bright

15 papers receiving 292 citations

Peers

James R. Bright

GHP

MSOR

SP

CP

SM

Alan Sheldon United States

John L. Davies United States

Davidson United States

Alfred W. Clark Australia

H. Skipton Leonard United States

Richard Brotman United States

Hjalmar Rosen United States

Yuko Fujigaki Japan

Thorleif Lund Norway

Peter Thunholm Sweden

Alan Sheldon United States

James R. Bright

93 ×1.3

GHP

78 ×1.2

MSOR

40 ×0.6

SP

63 ×1.1

CP

39 ×0.7

SM

Citations per year, relative to James R. Bright James R. Bright (= 1×) peers Alan Sheldon

Countries citing papers authored by James R. Bright

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James R. Bright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James R. Bright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James R. Bright more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James R. Bright

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James R. Bright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James R. Bright. The network helps show where James R. Bright may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James R. Bright

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James R. Bright. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James R. Bright based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James R. Bright. James R. Bright is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

15 of 15 papers shown

1.

Jones, Fiona, James R. Bright, & Jim Bright. (2001). Stress: Myth, Theory and Research. 191 indexed citations

2.

Bright, James R.. (1988). Evaluating Signals of Technological Change : Harvard Business Review. 3(4). 459. 1 indexed citations

3.

Bright, James R.. (1988). Implementing new technologies—Choice, decision and change in manufacturing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 33(2). 187–188. 7 indexed citations

4.

Bright, James R.. (1986). Improving the industrial anticipation of current scientific activity. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 29(1). 1–12. 3 indexed citations

5.

Bright, James R.. (1985). Clipped wings: The American SST conflict. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 27(4). 440–442. 1 indexed citations

6.

Bright, James R.. (1980). Technological innovation: Government/ industry cooperation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 16(4). 369–370. 7 indexed citations

7.

Bright, James R.. (1976). Technology and management. Futures. 8(2). 175–179. 5 indexed citations

8.

Bright, James R., et al.. (1973). A Guide to practical technological forecasting. Prentice Hall eBooks. 29 indexed citations

9.

Bright, James R.. (1972). Technology Forecasting—New Tools for an Old Responsibility. Research Management. 15(4). 50–65. 4 indexed citations

10.

Bright, James R.. (1972). A brief introduction to technology forecasting : concepts and exercises. Medical Entomology and Zoology. 5 indexed citations

11.

Quinn, James Brian & James R. Bright. (1971). Technological Forecasting for Industry and Government, Methods and Applications. Technology and Culture. 12(2). 376–376. 70 indexed citations

12.

Bright, James R.. (1969). Some management lessons from technological innovation research. Long Range Planning. 2(1). 36–41. 24 indexed citations

13.

Bright, James R.. (1964). Research, development, and technological innovation : an introduction. CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research). 5 indexed citations

14.

Bright, James R.. (1963). Exige a automatização maiores qualificações?. Revista de Administração de Empresas. 3(6). 103–138. 1 indexed citations

15.

Bright, James R.. (1957). MYTHS AND FALLACIES OF AUTOMATION. SAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series. 1. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact