James Pycock

1.4k citations
15 papers · 860 indexed · h-index 11

Impact in

Papers in

James Pycock

15 papers receiving 741 citations

Peers

James Pycock
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Human-Computer Interaction 575
  • Information Systems and Management 77
  • Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 189
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 51
  • Computer Science Applications 36
Replace Jon O’Brien with:
Jon O’Brien United Kingdom
Esko Kurvinen Finland
Janet Finlay United Kingdom
Katja Battarbee Finland
Rex Hartson United States
Joke Kort Netherlands
Jim Hollan United States
Rafael Ballagas United States
Michael Burmester Germany
Linda Candy Australia
James Pycock relative to Jon O’Brien United Kingdom Jon O’Brien's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Jon O’Brien · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James Pycock

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James Pycock's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Pycock with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Pycock more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James Pycock

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Pycock. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Pycock. The network helps show where James Pycock may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 22 scholars most cited alongside James Pycock, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James Pycock Line = papers co-authored together James Pycock links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2002232
2 200217
3 2001268
4 199811
5
Envisaging Collaboration: Using Virtual Environments to Articulate Requirements
19983
6 199653
7 1996126
8 199633
9 19943
10 19942
11 199449
12
Informing CSCW system requirements
199411
13 19934
14 199332
15 199216

About James Pycock

James Pycock is a scholar working on Human-Computer Interaction, Information Systems and Management, Computer Science Applications, Communication and Software, having authored 15 papers that have together received 860 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Usability and User Interface Design (5 papers), Personal Information Management and User Behavior (3 papers), Innovative Human-Technology Interaction (3 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (2 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers), Business Process Modeling and Analysis (2 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (2 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Human-Computer Interaction (575 citations), Information Systems and Management (77 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (189 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (51 citations) and Computer Science Applications (36 citations). James Pycock has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Jeffrey S. Bowers, Tom Rodden, Steve Benford, Chris Greenhalgh, Jon O’Brien, Allan MacLean, Peter Tolmie, Stephanie Wilson, Panos Markopoulos and Peter Johnson. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Information Technology and People, ACM SIGOIS Bulletin and Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026