James O’Shea

1.7k citations
50 papers · 985 indexed · 1 hit paper · h-index 12

James O’Shea

46 papers receiving 902 citations

Hit Papers

Sentence similarity based on semantic nets and corpus sta...5402006202620122019100200300400500

Peers

James O’Shea
Comparison fields: 5 of 98
  • Artificial Intelligence 733
  • Computer Science Applications 55
  • Information Systems 206
  • Signal Processing 49
  • Health Informatics 6
Replace Jakob Grue Simonsen with:
Jakob Grue Simonsen Denmark
Ingrid Zukerman Australia
Jacqueline Bourdeau Canada
Steve Yuan United States
Belén Díaz‐Agudo Spain
Chris Tar United States
Nazlia Omar Malaysia
Sheng-yi Kong Taiwan
Dani Yogatama United States
Pankaj Kumar Singh United States
James O’Shea relative to Jakob Grue Simonsen Denmark Jakob Grue Simonsen's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jakob Grue Simonsen · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by James O’Shea

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James O’Shea's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James O’Shea with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James O’Shea more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James O’Shea

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James O’Shea. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James O’Shea. The network helps show where James O’Shea may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 19 scholars most cited alongside James O’Shea, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with James O’Shea Line = papers co-authored together James O’Shea links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Adapted Psychological Profiling verses the right to an explainable decision
20181
2 201721
3 20151
4 20141
5 20144
6 20131
7 201317
8 201317
9 20120
10
Chapter 8 Systems Engineering and Conversational Agents
20111
11 20112
12 201015
13 20101
14 20083
15 20072
16 200641
17 200630
18 20068
19
A method for measuring sentence similarity and its application to conversational agents
200427
20 19982

About James O’Shea

James O’Shea is a scholar working on Theoretical Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Algebra and Number Theory, Health Informatics and Geometry and Topology, having authored 50 papers that have together received 985 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Topic Modeling (9 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (8 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (8 papers), Fuzzy Logic and Control Systems (7 papers), Deception detection and forensic psychology (6 papers), Neural Networks and Applications (6 papers), AI in Service Interactions (5 papers) and Algebraic and Geometric Analysis (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Artificial Intelligence (733 citations), Computer Science Applications (55 citations), Information Systems (206 citations), Signal Processing (49 citations) and Health Informatics (6 citations). James O’Shea has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Ireland and United States. Frequent co-authors include Keeley Crockett, Zuhair Bandar, David McLean, Yuhua Li, Annabel Latham, Wasiq Khan, Abir Hussain, Sumayh S. Aljameel, Lakhmi C. Jain and Svetlana Yanushkevich. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Algebra, Neural Networks, manuscripta mathematica, Fuzzy Sets and Systems and Comptes Rendus Mathématique.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026