James Onley
Impact in
- Anthropology top 5%
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade
Papers in
-
- Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts 7
- Socioeconomic Development in MENA 2
- Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies 1
-
- Global Maritime and Colonial Histories 7
- Colonialism, slavery, and trade 1
- Co-authors
- Sulayman N. Khalaf (1 shared paper)Gerd Nonneman (1 shared paper)Sandhya Mehta (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- History and Anthropology (1 paper)Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East (1 paper)Journal of Arabian Studies (4 papers)Asian Affairs (1 paper)SSRN Electronic Journal (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomOmanQatar
In The Last Decade
James Onley
10 papers receiving 151 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- Anthropology 66
- Space and Planetary Science 7
- Political Science and International Relations 83
- Sociology and Political Science 129
- Development 8
Countries citing papers authored by James Onley
This map shows the geographic impact of James Onley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Onley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Onley more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Onley
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Onley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Onley. The network helps show where James Onley may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 3 scholars most cited alongside James Onley, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2007 | 53 | |
| 2 | The Arabian Frontier of the British Raj: Merchants, Rulers, and the British in the Nineteenth-Century Gulf | 2007 | 38 |
| 3 | 2009 | 25 | |
| 4 | 2009 | 23 | |
| 5 | 2006 | 21 | |
| 6 | 2005 | 15 | |
| 7 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 8 | 2020 | 7 | |
| 9 | 2015 | 4 | |
| 10 | 2013 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 0 |
About James Onley
James Onley is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, Artificial Intelligence and Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, having authored 11 papers that have together received 198 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maritime and Colonial Histories (7 papers), Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (7 papers), Islamic Studies and History (5 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (2 papers), Colonial History and Postcolonial Studies (1 paper), Politics and Conflicts in Afghanistan, Pakistan, and Middle East (1 paper), Advanced X-ray and CT Imaging (1 paper) and Colonialism, slavery, and trade (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Anthropology (66 citations), Space and Planetary Science (7 citations), Political Science and International Relations (83 citations), Sociology and Political Science (129 citations) and Development (8 citations). James Onley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Oman and Qatar. Frequent co-authors include Sulayman N. Khalaf, Gerd Nonneman and Sandhya Mehta. Their work appears in journals such as History and Anthropology, Comparative Studies of South Asia Africa and the Middle East, Journal of Arabian Studies, Asian Affairs and SSRN Electronic Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.