Journal of Arabian Studies

230 papers and 1.0k indexed citations i.

About

The 230 papers published in Journal of Arabian Studies in the last decades have received a total of 1.0k indexed citations. Papers published in Journal of Arabian Studies usually cover Sociology and Political Science (203 papers), Political Science and International Relations (81 papers) and Anthropology (38 papers) specifically the topics of Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts (136 papers), Socioeconomic Development in MENA (125 papers) and Politics of Islamic Reform in Middle East (60 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Journal of Arabian Studies are Andrew Gardner, Clive Holes, Kristian Coates Ulrichsen, Mark C. Thompson, Fernando Carvajal, Martin Hvidt, Steffen Hertog, Abdoulaye Diop, Kaltham Al-Ghanim and Justin Gengler.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Journal of Arabian Studies

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Journal of Arabian Studies. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Journal of Arabian Studies.

Countries where authors publish in Journal of Arabian Studies

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Journal of Arabian Studies. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Journal of Arabian Studies with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Journal of Arabian Studies more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025