Mark T. Windham

1.6k total citations
90 papers, 1.3k citations indexed

About

Mark T. Windham is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Endocrinology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark T. Windham has authored 90 papers receiving a total of 1.3k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 52 papers in Plant Science, 38 papers in Cell Biology and 35 papers in Endocrinology. Recurrent topics in Mark T. Windham's work include Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (38 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (35 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (27 papers). Mark T. Windham is often cited by papers focused on Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (38 papers), Plant and Fungal Interactions Research (35 papers) and Forest Insect Ecology and Management (27 papers). Mark T. Windham collaborates with scholars based in United States, Czechia and Mexico. Mark T. Windham's co-authors include Robert N. Trigiano, Ðenita Hadziabdic, James M. Spiers, Timothy A. Rinehart, Jerome F. Grant, Phillip A. Wadl, Paris Lambdin, Gregory J. Wiggins, Brian E. Scheffler and Gustavo Caetano‐Anollés and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Plant Science and Crop Science.

In The Last Decade

Mark T. Windham

86 papers receiving 1.1k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark T. Windham United States 19 763 369 312 277 251 90 1.3k
Claude Husson France 21 872 1.1× 654 1.8× 377 1.2× 149 0.5× 539 2.1× 44 1.4k
Michael E. Ostry United States 19 538 0.7× 252 0.7× 266 0.9× 325 1.2× 351 1.4× 90 1.1k
Ari M. Hietala Norway 24 1.1k 1.4× 648 1.8× 379 1.2× 213 0.8× 686 2.7× 83 1.8k
J.H.M. Schneider Netherlands 15 2.0k 2.6× 402 1.1× 450 1.4× 145 0.5× 377 1.5× 24 2.4k
Luisa Ghelardini Italy 18 476 0.6× 304 0.8× 163 0.5× 117 0.4× 362 1.4× 48 870
M. Hubbes Canada 23 639 0.8× 466 1.3× 341 1.1× 142 0.5× 471 1.9× 83 1.2k
Charles H. Michler United States 21 825 1.1× 178 0.5× 624 2.0× 61 0.2× 210 0.8× 46 1.5k
Guillaume J. Bilodeau Canada 23 1.1k 1.4× 788 2.1× 447 1.4× 76 0.3× 205 0.8× 71 1.7k
Richard E. Baird United States 17 964 1.3× 422 1.1× 120 0.4× 211 0.8× 96 0.4× 93 1.1k
Ned Tisserat United States 24 1.2k 1.6× 608 1.6× 324 1.0× 436 1.6× 606 2.4× 86 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Mark T. Windham

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark T. Windham's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark T. Windham with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark T. Windham more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark T. Windham

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark T. Windham. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark T. Windham. The network helps show where Mark T. Windham may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark T. Windham

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark T. Windham. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark T. Windham based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark T. Windham. Mark T. Windham is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Windham, Mark T., et al.. (2023). Field Resistance to Rose Rosette Disease as Determined by Multi-Year Evaluations in Tennessee and Delaware. Pathogens. 12(3). 439–439. 4 indexed citations
2.
Ochoa, R., Gary R. Bauchan, Liesel G. Schneider, et al.. (2020). A Survey of Rose rosette virus and Eriophyid Mites Associated with Roses in the Southeastern United States. HortScience. 55(8). 1288–1294. 7 indexed citations
3.
Pemberton, H. Brent, et al.. (2018). What is Rose Rosette Disease?. HortScience. 53(5). 592–595. 19 indexed citations
4.
Byrne, David, et al.. (2018). Challenges of Breeding Rose Rosette–resistant Roses. HortScience. 53(5). 604–608. 12 indexed citations
5.
Wadl, Phillip A., Gregory J. Wiggins, Mark T. Windham, et al.. (2016). Thousand Cankers Disease Complex: A Forest Health Issue that Threatens Juglans Species across the U.S.. Forests. 7(11). 260–260. 14 indexed citations
6.
Wang, Xinwang, Timothy A. Rinehart, Phillip A. Wadl, et al.. (2009). A new electrophoresis technique to separate microsatellite alleles.. AFRICAN JOURNAL OF BIOTECHNOLOGY. 8(11). 2432–2436. 45 indexed citations
7.
Wadl, Phillip A., Xinwang Wang, John Skinner, et al.. (2008). Molecular Identification Keys for Cultivars and Lines of Cornus florida and C. kousa Based on Simple Sequence Repeat Loci. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 133(6). 783–793. 14 indexed citations
8.
Trigiano, Robert N., et al.. (2007). AFLP Markers Identify Cornus florida Cultivars and Lines. Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science. 132(1). 90–96. 16 indexed citations
9.
Wang, Xinwang, et al.. (2006). (290) Analysis of Genetic Diversity in Selected Cornus Species Using SSR Markers. HortScience. 41(4). 1077E–1078. 2 indexed citations
10.
Li, Yonghao, Mark T. Windham, Robert N. Trigiano, et al.. (2006). (44) Microscopic and Macroscopic Studies on the Development of Puccinia hemerocallidis in Resistant and Susceptible Daylily Cultivars. HortScience. 41(4). 1054B–1054. 1 indexed citations
11.
Hadziabdic, Ðenita, Robert N. Trigiano, Stephen Garton, & Mark T. Windham. (2005). (174) In Vitro Regeneration of Cornus kousa. HortScience. 40(4). 1052B–1052. 5 indexed citations
12.
Trigiano, Robert N., et al.. (2004). Genetic Profiling of Red-Bracted Cornus kousa Cultivars Indicates Significant Cultivar Synonomy. HortScience. 39(3). 489–492. 8 indexed citations
13.
Windham, Mark T., et al.. (2001). Evaluation of Disease Resistance among 57 Cultivars of Zinnia. HortTechnology. 11(1). 71–74. 3 indexed citations
14.
Caetano-Anoll�s, Gustavo, Robert N. Trigiano, & Mark T. Windham. (2001). Patterns of evolution in Discula fungi and the origin of dogwood anthracnose in North America, studied using arbitrarily amplified and ribosomal DNA. Current Genetics. 39(5-6). 346–354. 13 indexed citations
15.
Sams, Carl E., et al.. (2000). 012 Management of Powdery Mildew on Flowering Dogwood with Soybean Oil. HortScience. 35(3). 390A–390. 1 indexed citations
16.
Windham, Mark T. & Robert N. Trigiano. (1997). Are `Barton' and `Cloud 9' the Same Cultivar of Cornus florida?. HortScience. 32(4). 594D–594. 2 indexed citations
17.
Trigiano, Robert N., et al.. (1996). Sequence signatures from DNA amplification fingerprints reveal fine population structure of the dogwood pathogenDiscula destructiva. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 145(3). 377–383. 21 indexed citations
18.
Trigiano, Robert N., Gustavo Caetano‐Anollés, Brant J. Bassam, & Mark T. Windham. (1995). DNA amplification fingerprinting provides evidence that Discula destructiva , the cause of dogwood anthracnose in North America, is an introduced pathogen. Mycologia. 87(4). 490–500. 18 indexed citations
19.
Starman, Terri W., et al.. (1995). Enhanced Root and Shoot Growth of Chrysanthemum Cuttings Propagated with the Fungus Trichoderma harzianum. HortScience. 30(3). 496–498. 13 indexed citations
20.
Windham, Gary L., Mark T. Windham, & G. A. Pederson. (1993). Research Notes: Interaction of Trichoderma harzianum, Meloidogyne incognita, and Meloidogyne arenaria on Trifolium repens. Nematropica. 23(1). 99–103. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026