Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago
2011731 citationsJames M. McPartlandContemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviewsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James M. McPartland
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. McPartland's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. McPartland with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. McPartland more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. McPartland
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. McPartland. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. McPartland. The network helps show where James M. McPartland may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. McPartland
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. McPartland.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. McPartland based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James M. McPartland. James M. McPartland is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
McPartland, James M.. (2011). Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Contemporary Sociology A Journal of Reviews. 40(1). 16–17.731 indexed citations breakdown →
Braddock, Jomills Henry & James M. McPartland. (1993). Chapter 4: Education of Early Adolescents. Review of Research in Education. 19(1). 135–170.14 indexed citations
5.
McPartland, James M.. (1990). Staffing Decisions in the Middle Grades: Balancing Quality Instruction and Teacher/Student Relations.. Phi Delta Kappan. 71(6).10 indexed citations
6.
Braddock, Jomills Henry & James M. McPartland. (1990). Alternatives to Tracking.. Educational leadership. 47(7). 76–79.16 indexed citations
Braddock, Jomills Henry & James M. McPartland. (1988). The Social and Academic Consequences of School Desegregation.. 4.15 indexed citations
10.
McPartland, James M.. (1987). Balancing High Quality Subject-Matter Instruction with Positive Teacher-Student Relations in the Middle Grades: Effects of Departmentalization, Tracking and Block Scheduling on Learning Environments. Report No. 15..9 indexed citations
11.
McPartland, James M.. (1987). School Structures and Classroom Practices in Elementary, Middle, and Secondary Schools. Report No. 14..2 indexed citations
McPartland, James M., et al.. (1981). The Extent of Classroom Segregation within Desegregated Schools..10 indexed citations
15.
Bibby, Reginald W., James M. McPartland, & Edward L. McDill. (1978). Violence in Schools. The Canadian Journal of Sociology. 3(3). 385–385.6 indexed citations
McPartland, James M. & Edward L. McDill. (1974). High School Rules and Decision-Making Procedures as Sources of School Stability. A Report..1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.