James M. Edie
- Philosophy top 1%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Clinical Psychology
- Co-authors
- Maurice Merleau-PontyRichard C. McClearyCharles TaylorLester EmbreePaul RicœurJohn WildAlexandre KoyréGerald E. Myers
- Topics
- Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (13 papers)Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (7 papers)Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (5 papers)
- Journals
- The Philosophical ReviewThe Journal of PhilosophyJournal for the Scientific Study of Religion
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James M. Edie
35 papers receiving 518 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 109
- Philosophy 223
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 189
- Sociology and Political Science 156
- Social Psychology 87
- Clinical Psychology 83
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Edie
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Edie's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Edie with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Edie more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Edie
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Edie. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Edie. The network helps show where James M. Edie may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Edie
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Edie. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Edie based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Edie. James M. Edie is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | William James and phenomenology | 3 |
| 4 | Edmund Husserl's phenomenology | 3 |
| 5 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 11 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | The Cogito in Husserl's Philosophy | 10 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | Patterns of the life-world : essays in honor of John Wild | 2 |
| 14 | New Essays in Phenomenology Studies in the Philosophy of Experience | 2 |
| 15 | 0 | |
| 16 | The Primacy of Perception: And Other Essays on Phenomenological Psychology, the Philosophy of Art, History and Politics.breakdown → | 372 |
| 17 | The beginnings of Russian philosophy ; The slavophiles ; The westernizers | 1 |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 7 | |
| 20 | 11 |
About James M. Edie
James M. Edie is a scholar working on Philosophy, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 730 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy (13 papers), Philosophy, Ethics, and Existentialism (7 papers) and Hermeneutics and Narrative Identity (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (223 citations), General Psychology (19 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (189 citations). James M. Edie has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Maurice Merleau-Ponty, Richard C. McCleary, Charles Taylor, Lester Embree, Paul Ricœur, John Wild, Alexandre Koyré, Gerald E. Myers, John O’Neill and Fred Kersten. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, The Journal of Philosophy and Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.