Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Weak comparability of values as a foundation for ecological economics
This map shows the geographic impact of John O’Neill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by John O’Neill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites John O’Neill more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by John O’Neill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by John O’Neill. The network helps show where John O’Neill may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of John O’Neill
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of John O’Neill.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of John O’Neill based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with John O’Neill. John O’Neill is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
O’Neill, John, et al.. (2016). Dementia, Vulnerability and Well-being:Living Well with Dementia Together. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).6 indexed citations
2.
O’Neill, John. (2011). Money, Markets and Ecology. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).2 indexed citations
3.
O’Neill, John. (2009). Mark Sagoff, The Economy of the Earth: Philosophy, Law, and the Environment, 2nd edition. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
4.
O’Neill, John. (2009). Don Manuel Pérez de Guzmán, Marqués de Jerez de los Caballeros, Bibliófilo y Académico. LA Referencia (Red Federada de Repositorios Institucionales de Publicaciones Científicas). 331–344.2 indexed citations
5.
O’Neill, John. (2006). Who Speaks for Nature?. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).5 indexed citations
O’Neill, John, et al.. (2001). Environmental Ethics and Philosophy. UEA Digital Repository (University of East Anglia).3 indexed citations
10.
O’Neill, John. (1996). Costing Environmental Damage. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
11.
O’Neill, John. (1996). Hegel's dialectic of desire and recognition : texts and commentary. State University of New York Press eBooks.20 indexed citations
12.
O’Neill, John. (1995). Public Goods, Environmental Goods, Institutional Economics. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).1 indexed citations
13.
O’Neill, John. (1995). I gotta use words when I talk to you. History of the Human Sciences. 8.1 indexed citations
14.
O’Neill, John. (1995). Essences and Markets. The Monist. 78(3). 258–275.7 indexed citations
15.
O’Neill, John. (1994). Humanism and Nature. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester).7 indexed citations
16.
O’Neill, John. (1994). "The same thing therefore ought to be and ought not to be": Anselm on Conflicting Oughts. The Heythrop Journal. 25.1 indexed citations
O’Neill, John. (1964). Alienation, Class Struggle and Marxian Anti-Politics. The review of metaphysics. 17(3). 462–471.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.