James M. Clinton
Impact in
-
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin
- Neuroscience of respiration and sleep
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Sleep and Wakefulness Research
Papers in
-
- Neuroscience of respiration and sleep 4
- Circadian rhythm and melatonin 3
-
- Sleep and Wakefulness Research 8
- Co-authors
- James M. Krueger (8 shared papers)Christopher J. Davis (7 shared papers)Mark R. Zielinski (6 shared papers)Kathryn A. Jewett (3 shared papers)Ping Taishi (5 shared papers)Bradley D. Winters (2 shared papers)JAMES C. FEELEY (1 shared paper)Benedict G. Archer (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Journal of Applied Physiology (4 papers)Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine (2 papers)European Journal of Neuroscience (1 paper)Progress in brain research (1 paper)New England Journal of Medicine (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James M. Clinton
12 papers receiving 603 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 78
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 207
- Cognitive Neuroscience 311
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 195
- Biological Psychiatry 16
- Physiology 31
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Clinton
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Clinton more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Clinton
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Clinton. The network helps show where James M. Clinton may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 15 scholars most cited alongside James M. Clinton, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2011 | 128 | |
| 2 | 2011 | 107 | |
| 3 | 2011 | 91 | |
| 4 | 1969 | 75 | |
| 5 | 2010 | 73 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 36 | |
| 7 | 2012 | 35 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 32 | |
| 9 | 2011 | 29 | |
| 10 | 1969 | 22 | |
| 11 | 1967 | 9 | |
| 12 | 2026 | 2 |
About James M. Clinton
James M. Clinton is a scholar working on Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Physiology and Cancer Research, having authored 12 papers that have together received 639 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (8 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers), Sleep and related disorders (3 papers), Circadian rhythm and melatonin (3 papers), Adenosine and Purinergic Signaling (2 papers), Microbial infections and disease research (1 paper), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (1 paper) and Energy Harvesting in Wireless Networks (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (207 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (311 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (195 citations), Biological Psychiatry (16 citations) and Physiology (31 citations). James M. Clinton has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include James M. Krueger, Christopher J. Davis, Mark R. Zielinski, Kathryn A. Jewett, Ping Taishi, Bradley D. Winters, JAMES C. FEELEY, Benedict G. Archer, Lowell S. Young and Éva Szentirmai. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Applied Physiology, Journal of Clinical Sleep Medicine, European Journal of Neuroscience, Progress in brain research and New England Journal of Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.