James M. Clinton

783 total citations
11 papers, 580 citations indexed

About

James M. Clinton is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, James M. Clinton has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 580 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 7 papers in Endocrine and Autonomic Systems and 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in James M. Clinton's work include Sleep and Wakefulness Research (8 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (3 papers). James M. Clinton is often cited by papers focused on Sleep and Wakefulness Research (8 papers), Neuroscience of respiration and sleep (4 papers) and Sleep and related disorders (3 papers). James M. Clinton collaborates with scholars based in United States. James M. Clinton's co-authors include James M. Krueger, Christopher J. Davis, Mark R. Zielinski, Kathryn A. Jewett, Ping Taishi, Bradley D. Winters, Benedict G. Archer, Lowell S. Young, J C Feeley and Alok De and has published in prestigious journals such as New England Journal of Medicine, Journal of Applied Physiology and European Journal of Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

James M. Clinton

11 papers receiving 552 citations

Peers

James M. Clinton
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 320
  • Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 229
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 217
  • Molecular Biology 83
  • Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 66
Replace Stuart Winston with:
Stuart Winston United States
Tiina Wallden Finland
Björn Owe‐Larsson Sweden
James M. Krueger United States
Anthony van den Pol United States
Reija Alén Finland
L. A. Toth United States
Keiko Arakawa United States
Wei Ba China
Alfredo Vittoria Italy
Stuart Winston United States View profile →
Citations per field, relative to James M. Clinton
James M. Clinton · 1×
Citations per year, relative to James M. Clinton
James M. Clinton · 1×

Countries citing papers authored by James M. Clinton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Clinton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Clinton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Clinton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Clinton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Clinton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Clinton. The network helps show where James M. Clinton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Clinton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Clinton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Clinton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Clinton. James M. Clinton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
# Work Indexed citations
1 32
2 29
3 87
4 123
5 26
6 33
7 93
8 67
9 60
10 21
11 9

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026