James M. Cantor
- Clinical Psychology top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 1%
- Social Psychology top 2%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 2%
- Gender Studies top 1%
- Co-authors
- Ray BlanchardPhilip E. KlassenRobert DickeyMichael E. KubanThomas BlakMichael C. SetoAmy D. LykinsBruce K. Christensen
- Topics
- Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (29 papers)Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (20 papers)Sexual function and dysfunction studies (15 papers)
- Journals
- Psychological BulletinJournal of Consulting and Clinical PsychologyJournal of Abnormal Psychology
- Partner nations
- CanadaAustraliaUnited States
In The Last Decade
James M. Cantor
64 papers receiving 2.8k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Clinical Psychology 2.1k
- Sociology and Political Science 983
- Social Psychology 630
- Psychiatry and Mental health 582
- Gender Studies 536
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Cantor
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Cantor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Cantor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Cantor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Cantor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Cantor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Cantor. The network helps show where James M. Cantor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James M. Cantor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James M. Cantor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James M. Cantor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James M. Cantor. James M. Cantor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 12 | |
| 2 | 20 | |
| 3 | 15 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 20 | |
| 6 | 24 | |
| 7 | 40 | |
| 8 | 55 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 140 | |
| 12 | 110 | |
| 13 | 37 | |
| 14 | 62 | |
| 15 | 122 | |
| 16 | 84 | |
| 17 | 81 | |
| 18 | 70 | |
| 19 | 93 | |
| 20 | 152 |
About James M. Cantor
James M. Cantor is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Gender Studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 65 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending (29 papers), Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology (20 papers) and Sexual function and dysfunction studies (15 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (2.1k citations), Gender Studies (536 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (582 citations). James M. Cantor has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, Australia and United States. Frequent co-authors include Ray Blanchard, Philip E. Klassen, Robert Dickey, Michael E. Kuban, Thomas Blak, Michael C. Seto, Amy D. Lykins, Bruce K. Christensen, Ian V. McPhail and Margaret O’Connor. Their work appears in journals such as Psychological Bulletin, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Journal of Abnormal Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.