James M. Bower
Impact in
- Sensory Systems top 0.05%
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
- Neurology top 0.1%
- Vestibular and auditory disorders
Papers in
-
- Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies 27
- Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics 19
- Neurology 50
- Vestibular and auditory disorders 49
- Co-authors
- David BeemanErik De SchutterMichael E. HasselmoLewis B. HaberlyPeter T. FoxAlfredo FontaniniLawrence M. ParsonsDonald C. Woolston
- Journals
- Journal of Neurophysiology (16 papers)BMC Neuroscience (11 papers)The Journal of Comparative Neurology (9 papers)Journal of Computational Neuroscience (7 papers)Trends in Neurosciences (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBelgiumGermany
In The Last Decade
James M. Bower
149 papers receiving 9.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 181
- Sensory Systems 2.3k
- Neurology 3.3k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 6.0k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 4.4k
- Endocrine and Autonomic Systems 566
Countries citing papers authored by James M. Bower
This map shows the geographic impact of James M. Bower's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James M. Bower with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James M. Bower more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James M. Bower
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James M. Bower. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James M. Bower. The network helps show where James M. Bower may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside James M. Bower, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Consensus Paper: Roles of the Cerebellum in Motor Control—The Diversity of Ideas on Cerebellar Involvement in Movement Hit paper breakdown → | 2011 | 664 |
| 2 | Computational Modeling of Genetic and Biochemical Networks (Computational Molecular Biology) | 2004 | 14 |
| 3 | Quantifying Olfactory Perception: Mapping Olfactory Perception Space by Using Multidimensional Scaling and Self-Organizing Maps | 2002 | 2 |
| 4 | Arts and Culture Online for Education: The Getty's Digital Imaging Initiatives | 1998 | 1 |
| 5 | Imaging with electricity: how weakly electric fish might perceive objects | 1997 | 13 |
| 6 | Science Education Reform: How Can We Help?. | 1996 | 11 |
| 7 | Cholinergic Modulation May Enhance Cortical Associative Memory Function | 1990 | 7 |
| 8 | Reverse engineering the nervous system: an anatomical, physiological, and computer based approach | 1990 | 18 |
| 9 | Children's use of an interactive science library: Exploratory research | 1990 | 6 |
| 10 | A Computer Modeling Approach to Understanding the Inferior Olive and Its Relationships to the Cerebellar Cortex in Rats | 1989 | 3 |
| 11 | The simulation of large-scale neural networks | 1989 | 86 |
| 12 | Computer Simulation of Oscillatory Behavior in Cerebral Cortical Networks | 1989 | 5 |
| 13 | Computational Efficiency: A Common Organizing Principle for Parallel Computer Maps and Brain Maps? | 1989 | 2 |
| 14 | Simulating neurons and networks on parallel computers | 1989 | 7 |
| 15 | Simulation and Measurement of the Electric Fields Generated by Weakly Electric Fish | 1988 | 17 |
| 16 | Neural Control of Sensory Acquisition: The Vestibulo-Ocular Reflex | 1988 | 7 |
| 17 | One-Stop Shopping: RLIN as a Union Catalog for Research Collections at the Getty Center | 1988 | 0 |
| 18 | A Computer Simulation of Olfactory Cortex with Functional Implications for Storage and Retrieval of Olfactory Information | 1987 | 36 |
| 19 | Optimal Neural Spike Classification | 1987 | 1 |
| 20 | Neural Networks for Template Matching: Application to Real-Time Classification of the Action Potentials of Real Neurons | 1987 | 4 |
About James M. Bower
James M. Bower is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Neurology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Information Systems and Management, having authored 154 papers that have together received 10.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neural dynamics and brain function (58 papers), Vestibular and auditory disorders (49 papers), Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (32 papers), Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (27 papers), Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (19 papers), Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research (12 papers), Memory and Neural Mechanisms (10 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Sensory Systems (2.3k citations), Neurology (3.3k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (6.0k citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (4.4k citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (566 citations). James M. Bower has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Belgium and Germany. Frequent co-authors include David Beeman, Erik De Schutter, Michael E. Hasselmo, Lewis B. Haberly, Peter T. Fox, Alfredo Fontanini, Lawrence M. Parsons, Donald C. Woolston, Upinder S. Bhalla and Mark Nelson. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neurophysiology, BMC Neuroscience, The Journal of Comparative Neurology, Journal of Computational Neuroscience and Trends in Neurosciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.