Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Lower Upper Bound Estimation Method for Construction of Neural Network-Based Prediction Intervals
2010564 citationsAbbas Khosravi, Saeid Nahavandi et al.IEEE Transactions on Neural Networksprofile →
An Empirical Comparison of Machine Learning Models for Time Series Forecasting
This map shows the geographic impact of Amir F. Atiya's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Amir F. Atiya with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Amir F. Atiya more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Amir F. Atiya. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Amir F. Atiya. The network helps show where Amir F. Atiya may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Amir F. Atiya
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Amir F. Atiya.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Amir F. Atiya based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Amir F. Atiya. Amir F. Atiya is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Elreedy, Dina, Amir F. Atiya, & Firuz Kamalov. (2023). A theoretical distribution analysis of synthetic minority oversampling technique (SMOTE) for imbalanced learning. Machine Learning. 113(7). 4903–4923.142 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Shoeibi, Afshin, Navid Ghassemi, Marjane Khodatars, et al.. (2020). Epileptic seizure detection using deep learning techniques: A Review. arXiv (Cornell University).24 indexed citations
4.
Elreedy, Dina & Amir F. Atiya. (2019). A Comprehensive Analysis of Synthetic Minority Oversampling Technique (SMOTE) for handling class imbalance. Information Sciences. 505. 32–64.422 indexed citations breakdown →
5.
Nabil, Mahmoud, Mohamed Aly, & Amir F. Atiya. (2015). ASTD: Arabic Sentiment Tweets Dataset. 2515–2519.260 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Nabil, Mahmoud, Mohamed Aly, & Amir F. Atiya. (2014). LABR: A Large Scale Arabic Book Reviews Dataset. arXiv (Cornell University).7 indexed citations
7.
Atiya, Amir F., et al.. (2009). Symbolic function network. Neural Networks. 22(4). 395–404.1 indexed citations
Magdon‐Ismail, Malik & Amir F. Atiya. (1998). Neural Networks for Density Estimation. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology). 11. 522–528.11 indexed citations
Parlos, A.G., M. Jayakumar, & Amir F. Atiya. (1992). Early detection of incipient faults in power plants using accelerated neural network learning. Transactions of the American Nuclear Society. 66.3 indexed citations
Atiya, Amir F. & Yaser S. Abu‐Mostafa. (1989). A Method for the Associative Storage of Analog Vectors. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology). 2. 590–595.6 indexed citations
19.
Bower, James M. & Amir F. Atiya. (1987). Optimal Neural Spike Classification. Neural Information Processing Systems. 95–102.1 indexed citations
20.
Atiya, Amir F.. (1987). Learning on a General Network. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology). 22–30.32 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.