James Loeffler
Impact in
Papers in
-
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 10
- Communism, Protests, Social Movements 4
- Human Rights and Development 2
-
- Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics 5
- Soviet and Russian History 3
- International Law and Human Rights 3
- Co-authors
- Mila Versteeg (2 shared papers)Philip V. Bohlman (1 shared paper)David Conway (1 shared paper)Mark Slobin (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Jewish Quarterly Review (3 papers)Law and Contemporary Problems (2 papers)Jewish Social Studies (2 papers)Slavic Review (1 paper)Harvard Theological Review (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James Loeffler
13 papers receiving 55 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 19
- Music 10
- History 31
- Political Science and International Relations 45
- Sociology and Political Science 58
- Demography 12
Countries citing papers authored by James Loeffler
This map shows the geographic impact of James Loeffler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Loeffler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Loeffler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Loeffler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Loeffler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Loeffler. The network helps show where James Loeffler may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 4 scholars most cited alongside James Loeffler, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Rooted Cosmopolitans: Jews and Human Rights in the Twentieth Century | 2018 | 22 |
| 2 | 2010 | 9 | |
| 3 | 2015 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2010 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2017 | 6 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 5 | |
| 7 | 2010 | 5 | |
| 8 | 2014 | 3 | |
| 9 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2015 | 3 | |
| 11 | Foreword: The Future of Human Rights Scholarship | 2018 | 2 |
| 12 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 13 | The Future of Human Rights Scholarship | 2018 | 1 |
| 14 | 2021 | 1 | |
| 15 | Promising Harmonies: The Aural Politics of Polish-Jewish Relations in the Russian Empire | 2014 | 1 |
| 16 | The 'Lust Machine': Recording and Selling the Jewish Nation in the Late Russian Empire | 2020 | 1 |
| 17 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 18 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 19 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 20 | 2022 | 0 |
About James Loeffler
James Loeffler is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Political Science and International Relations, History, Demography and Music, having authored 20 papers that have together received 79 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (10 papers), Historical and Contemporary Political Dynamics (7 papers), Historical Geopolitical and Social Dynamics (5 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (4 papers), Soviet and Russian History (3 papers), International Law and Human Rights (3 papers), Jewish Identity and Society (3 papers) and Human Rights and Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (10 citations), History (31 citations), Political Science and International Relations (45 citations), Sociology and Political Science (58 citations) and Demography (12 citations). James Loeffler has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Mila Versteeg, Philip V. Bohlman, David Conway and Mark Slobin. Their work appears in journals such as The Jewish Quarterly Review, Law and Contemporary Problems, Jewish Social Studies, Slavic Review and Harvard Theological Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.