James L. Payne
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Economics and Econometrics top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Demography top 10%
- Topics
- Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia (4 papers)International Relations in Latin America (3 papers)History and Politics in Latin America (3 papers)
- Journals
- American Political Science ReviewAmerican Journal of Political ScienceThe Journal of Politics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
James L. Payne
31 papers receiving 237 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Political Science and International Relations 180
- Sociology and Political Science 99
- Economics and Econometrics 76
- Strategy and Management 43
- Demography 41
Countries citing papers authored by James L. Payne
This map shows the geographic impact of James L. Payne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James L. Payne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James L. Payne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James L. Payne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James L. Payne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James L. Payne. The network helps show where James L. Payne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James L. Payne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James L. Payne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James L. Payne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James L. Payne. James L. Payne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Government Fails, Long Live Government!: The Rise of "Failurism" | 0 |
| 2 | Budgeting in Neverland Irrational Policymaking in the U.S. Congress and What Can Be Done about It | 2 |
| 3 | The Smart Samaritan | 1 |
| 4 | Profit Is Not a Dirty Word: The Role of Money in Education. | 0 |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 40 | |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 9 | |
| 15 | 12 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 24 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | 5 |
About James L. Payne
James L. Payne is a scholar working on Public Administration, Development and Safety Research, having authored 35 papers that have together received 327 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Conflict, Peace, and Violence in Colombia (4 papers), International Relations in Latin America (3 papers) and History and Politics in Latin America (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Political Science and International Relations (180 citations), Public Administration (17 citations) and Communication (29 citations). James L. Payne has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Alexander Wilde, John D. Martz, Gordon Tullock, Robert E. Scott and Jeffrey C. Robinson. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and The Journal of Politics.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.