James Kwan
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 10%
- General Health Professions top 10%
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Physiology
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
- Co-authors
- Brennan SpiegelMichelle S. KellerSasan MosadeghiSean DelshadBenjamin NoahDaniel LewVartan C. TashjianLise Mogensen
- Topics
- Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (6 papers)Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers)Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaGastroenterologyThe American Journal of Gastroenterology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaSingapore
In The Last Decade
James Kwan
27 papers receiving 379 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 139
- General Health Professions 99
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 41
- Physiology 40
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 38
Countries citing papers authored by James Kwan
This map shows the geographic impact of James Kwan's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Kwan with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Kwan more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Kwan
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Kwan. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Kwan. The network helps show where James Kwan may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Kwan
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Kwan. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Kwan based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Kwan. James Kwan is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 2 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 8 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 29 | |
| 12 | 4 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 3 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 20 | |
| 19 | 41 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About James Kwan
James Kwan is a scholar working on Family Practice, Emergency Medical Services and Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, having authored 30 papers that have together received 390 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions (6 papers), Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers) and Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (36 citations), Health Informatics (9 citations) and Applied Psychology (32 citations). James Kwan has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and Singapore. Frequent co-authors include Brennan Spiegel, Michelle S. Keller, Sasan Mosadeghi, Sean Delshad, Benjamin Noah, Daniel Lew, Vartan C. Tashjian, Lise Mogensen, Wendy Hu and Cees van der Vleuten. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Gastroenterology and The American Journal of Gastroenterology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.