Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Assessment of the economic impact of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome on swine production in the United States
2005878 citationsJames Kliebenstein, Jeffrey J. Zimmerman et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by James Kliebenstein
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James Kliebenstein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Kliebenstein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Kliebenstein more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Kliebenstein
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Kliebenstein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Kliebenstein. The network helps show where James Kliebenstein may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Kliebenstein
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Kliebenstein.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Kliebenstein based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James Kliebenstein. James Kliebenstein is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (2002). Comparison of Premiums and Returns in Organic Pork Production. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1(1).1 indexed citations
3.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (2002). Cost of Organic Pork Production. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1(1).1 indexed citations
4.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (2002). Comparison of Pig Flow and Labor Needs in Two Organic Pork Production Systems. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1(1).1 indexed citations
5.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (2000). Cost of Finishing Pigs in Hoop and Confinement Facilities. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1(1).1 indexed citations
6.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (2000). A Look at Consumer Willingness to Pay for Pork Products with Environmental Attributes. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1(1).2 indexed citations
7.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (2000). Analysis of Growth of Pigs in Grow-Finish Facilities. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1(1).
8.
Honeyman, Mark S., et al.. (1999). Research and demonstration updates: ISU Rhodes Research Farm and PFI on-farm cooperator data. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).3 indexed citations
9.
Honeyman, Mark S., et al.. (1999). Performance and Budget Analysis of Finishing Pigs in Hoop Structures and Confinement During the Winter: First Group Results. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1(1).1 indexed citations
10.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1997). Cost of on-farm microbial testing for Salmonella: An application by farm size and prevalence level. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University). 1(1).
11.
Patton, S., et al.. (1996). Seroprevalence of Toxoplasma Gondii in Hogs in the National Animal Health Monitoring System (Nahms). Staff General Research Papers Archive.3 indexed citations
12.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1994). Motivations, Attitudes, and Expectations of Growers, Contractors, and Independent Hog Produ. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).2 indexed citations
13.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1994). Expansion Plans in Iowa Contract Hog Production. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).1 indexed citations
14.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1994). size and Growth of Contract Hog Production in Iowa. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).1 indexed citations
15.
Kliebenstein, James. (1992). Evaluation of Pork Production Contracts. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).2 indexed citations
16.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1991). Investment, Returns and Marketing Practices in Iowa Contract Hog Production. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).3 indexed citations
17.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1991). Size and Distribution of Contract Hog Production in Iowa. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).5 indexed citations
18.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1991). Comparing Pork Production Contracts. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).1 indexed citations
19.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1988). Determination of Swine Pneumonia and Impacts on Production Costs Through Slaughter Checks. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).1 indexed citations
20.
Kliebenstein, James, et al.. (1987). The Effects of Bovine Growth Hormone (bGH) on Dairy Farm Profitability by Type of Government Program. Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.