Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to James K. Sebenius James K. Sebenius (= 1×)
peers
Robert B. McKersie
Countries citing papers authored by James K. Sebenius
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of James K. Sebenius's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James K. Sebenius with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James K. Sebenius more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James K. Sebenius
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James K. Sebenius. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James K. Sebenius. The network helps show where James K. Sebenius may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James K. Sebenius
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James K. Sebenius.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James K. Sebenius based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with James K. Sebenius. James K. Sebenius is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Sebenius, James K., et al.. (2012). Is a Nuclear Deal with Iran Possible.1 indexed citations
5.
Sebenius, James K., et al.. (2011). Peace, Non-Aligned: The Pragmatic Optimism of Lakhdar Brahimi. 76(16). 505–13.1 indexed citations
6.
Sebenius, James K., et al.. (2010). Esquel Group: Building a Sustainable Partnership with Cotton Farmers in Xinjiang (A). SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
7.
Leary, Kimberlyn, et al.. (2009). Negotiating the Path of Abraham.1 indexed citations
8.
Sebenius, James K.. (2009). Assess, Don't Assume, Part I: Etiquette and National Culture in Negotiation.1 indexed citations
9.
Sebenius, James K., et al.. (2007). Lou Pritchett: Negotiating the P&G Relationship with Wal-Mart. 19(10). 3, 7–3, 7.1 indexed citations
10.
Lax, David A. & James K. Sebenius. (2006). 3-d Negotiation: Powerful Tools to Change the Game in Your Most Important Deals. Bulletin of Miscellaneous Information (Royal Gardens Kew). 9(4). 563–9.91 indexed citations
11.
Lempereur, Alain & James K. Sebenius. (2004). Les théories de la négociation au service des pratiques du manager. Revue française de gestion. 9–11.1 indexed citations
12.
Lax, David A. & James K. Sebenius. (2004). Anchoring the Big Picture. The Science of The Total Environment. 832. 155124–155124.
13.
Lax, David A. & James K. Sebenius. (2003). 3-D negotiation. Playing the whole game.. PubMed. 81(11). 64–74, 138.17 indexed citations
14.
Lax, David A., et al.. (2003). Negociar el espíritu del acuerdo. Harvard business review. 81(2). 52–61.8 indexed citations
15.
Lax, David A. & James K. Sebenius. (2003). 3-D Negotiation. Harvard business review. 81(11). 64–72.4 indexed citations
16.
Sebenius, James K. & David A. Lax. (2003). Negociación 3-D: el juego total. Harvard business review. 81(11). 74–87.17 indexed citations
17.
Sebenius, James K.. (2002). Negotiating Lessons From the Browser Wars. MIT Sloan management review. 43(4). 43–50.6 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.